ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2025, V. 22, No. 5, pp. 425-434

Monitoring climate and environmental risks using Earth remote sensing data in the banking sector

G.Kh. Gaynutdinova 1 , Yu.V. Balmashev 1 , V.N. Korotkov 2 , Ya.K. Kulikov 1 
1 Sberbank PJSC, Moscow, Russia
2 Yu. A. Izrael Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Moscow, Russia
Accepted: 21.07.2025
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2025-22-5-425-434
In the context of global climate change and growing environmental threats, financial institutions face the need to integrate climate and environmental risk monitoring into their operations. Remote sensing of the Earth (RSE) can serve as a crucial tool for assessing such risks, enabling banks to incorporate climate and environmental factors into their business strategies, manage investment risks, and comply with international sustainable development standards. The application of satellite data allows financial organizations to: assess environmental conditions in areas where collateral assets are located, identify potential threats (such as oil spills, wildfire spread, increased concentrations of harmful substances in the atmosphere), and monitor clients’ compliance with environmental regulations. This significantly reduces investment risks and enhances organizations’ ability to respond promptly to international environmental responsibility requirements. This article examines current aspects of practical application of RSE technologies in the banking sector, while also focusing on the development of predictive models for forecasting climate change. At the same time, it highlights a number of limitations and barriers hindering widespread adoption of RSE technologies in banking processes. The study demonstrates how modern remote monitoring technologies can contribute to enhancing banks’ resilience in the face of global environmental and climate challenges.
Keywords: environmental risks, climate risks, Earth remote sensing, banking sector, risk management in banking
Full text

References:

  1. Anisimov O. A., Lavrov S. A., Global warming and permafrost melting: risk assessment for energy industry facilities, Tekhnologii TEK, 2004, No. 3, pp. 78–83 (in Russian).
  2. Babayants I. P., Baryakh A. A., Volkova M. S. et al., Monitoring of land surface subsidence in Berezniki (Perm Krai) using satellite radar interferometry methods. I. Differential interferometry, Geophysical Research, 2021, V. 22, No. 4, pp. 73–89 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21455/gR2021.4-5.
  3. Venetsiansky A. S., Ivantsova E. A., Shulikina M. P., Remote monitoring of air quality in the City of Volgograd, Natural Systems and Resources, 2022, V. 12, No. 2, pp. 21–28 (in Russian), https://doi.org/10.15688/nsr.jvolsu.2022.2.3.
  4. Gorbachev I. N., Metody i algoritmy analiza snimkov bortovogo videoregistratora bespilotnogo letatel’nogo apparata v sisteme upravleniya monitoringom landshaftnykh pozharov: Diss. … kand. tekh. nauk (Methods and algorithms for analyzing onboard UAV video recorder imagery in landscape fire monitoring management systems, Cand. tech. sci. thesis), Kursk, 2025, 149 p. (in Russian).
  5. Doklad o klimaticheskikh riskakh na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Report on climate risks in the Russian Federation), Saint Petersburg, 2017, 106 p. (in Russian).
  6. Informatsionnoe pis’mo Banka Rossii “O rekomendatsiyakh po uchetu klimaticheskikh riskov dlya finansovykh organizatsii” (Information letter of the Bank of Russia “On recommendations for accounting for climate risks for financial organizations”), Dec. 4, 2002, No. IN-018-35/60 (in Russian).
  7. Kurganovich K. A., Shalikovskiy A. V., Bosov M. A., Kochev D. V., Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to control the use of flood-prone areas, Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management, 2021, No. 3, pp. 6–24 (in Russian), DOI: 10.35567/19994508-2021-3-1.
  8. Labutina I. A., Baldina E. A., Ispol’zovanie dannykh distantsionnogo zondirovaniya dlya monitoringa ehkosistem OOPT: metodicheskoe posobie (Remote sensing data for monitoring protected area ecosystems: Methodological guide), Moscow: World Wildlife Fund (WWF Russia), 2011, 88 p. (in Russian).
  9. Lozovoy S. V., Leak detection systems in oil and gas fields, Russian J. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2024, V. 11, No. 1, 10 p. (in Russian), DOI: 10.15862/03NZOR124.
  10. Nizamutdinov R. I., Obnaruzheniye utechek na nefteprovodakh s beznapornymi uchastkami na printsipakh kontrolya osnovnykh parametrov potoka: Diss. … kand. tekh. nauk (Detection of leaks in oil pipelines with gravity-flow sections based on monitoring of main flow parameters: Cand. tech. sci. thesis), Saint Petersburg, 2016, 114 p. (in Russian).
  11. Bekhechi M., Some observations regarding environmental covenants and conditionnalities in World Bank lending activities, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 1999, V. 3, pp. 287–314, DOI: 10.1163/187574199X00072.
  12. Choy S., Jiang S., Liao S., Wang E., Public environmental enforcement and private lender monitoring: Evidence from environmental covenants, J. Accounting and Economics, 2024, V. 77(2), Article 101621, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101621.
  13. Copăcean L., Man E. T., Cojocariu L. L. et al., GIS-based flood assessment using hydraulic modeling and open source data: An example of application, Applied Sciences, 2025, V. 15, Article 2520, DOI: 10.3390/app15052520.
  14. EIB Group Risk Management Disclosure report 2020, European Investment Bank Group, 2021, 142 p.
  15. European Investment Bank Environmental and Social Standards, European Investment Bank, 2022, 96 p.
  16. Fioletov V. E., McLinden C. A., Krotkov N. et al., A global catalogue of large SO2 sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, V. 16, Iss. 18, pp. 11497–11519, DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016v.
  17. Ialongo I., Virta H., Eskes H. et al., Comparison of TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 Precursor NO2 observations with ground-based measurements in Helsinki, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2020, No. 13, pp. 205–218, DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-205-2020.
  18. Klimont Z., Kupiainen K., Heyes C. et al., Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, V. 17, Iss. 14, pp. 8681–8723, DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017.
  19. Point of departure and key concepts, In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK; NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 121–196, DOI: 10.1017/9781009325844.003.
  20. Vallée A., Duval C., Flooding of industrial facilities — vulnerability reduction in practice, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2012, V. 26, pp. 111–116, DOI: 10.3303/CET1226019.
  21. Yang L., Feng Y., Wang Y., Wang J., Refined fire detection and band selection method in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery based on sparse-VIT, Infrared Physics and Technology, 2024, V. 137, Article 105104, DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2023.105104.
  22. Yu Q., Wang Y., Li N., Extreme flood disasters: Comprehensive impact and assessment, Water, 2022, V. 14, Iss. 8, Article 1211, DOI: 10.3390/w14081211.