Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 22, 2025
Number 1 Number 2
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2025, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 85-98

Assessment of landscape transformation in regions of new development based on satellite data (Khabarovsk Krai as an example)

A.V. Ostroukhov 1 
1 Institute of the Water and Ecology Problems FEB RAS, Khabarovsk, Russia
Accepted: 28.01.2025
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2025-22-2-85-98
Based on the landscape map of territory, the data from Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) MODIS Collection 6 and Global Forest Change (GFC) projects, a methodology for classifying the landscapes in the regions of new development according to the degree and extent of anthropogenic transformation has been developed and tested. The peculiarity of these regions is that anthropogenic activity does not lead to the formation of large areas of residential-industrial and agricultural landscapes, the proportion of which is traditionally used to assess the degree of transformation of the natural environment. The results of assessment of the degree of transformation of the territory of Khabarovsk Region reflect the current level of transformation of the landscapes of the territory at 60.67 %, of which only 0.33 % refers to anthropogenic landscapes: rural-industrial and agricultural. The share of preserved indigenous natural landscapes is 39 %, varying in landscapes of different natural zones from 71.7 % (of the area of the zone) for tundra landscapes to 31.8 % for forest geosystems. Along with the main parameters (landscape type index, area, scale and degree of transformation), the attribute table of the resulting map contains additional characteristics of the landscape cover of the territory, reflecting its physical-geographical zoning, zonal-sector and altitude-belt structure and others. All this provides an opportunity for extended analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of landscape transformation, detailed analysis of spatial features and results of anthropogenic transformation of the territory.
Keywords: landscape transformation, Global Forest Change, regions of new development, Khabarovsk Krai, reforestation
Full text

References:

  1. Alekseev I. A., Puzanov A. V., Cheremkin I. M., Stupnikova T. V., Borisenko E. N., Characterisation of anthropogenic transformations of landscapes of the designed cosmodrome “Vostochny”, Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2010, No. 6(25), pp. 262–267 (in Russian).
  2. Andreev D. N., Methodology of complex diagnostics of anthropogenic transformation of specially protected natural territories, Geograficheskii vestnik, 2012, No. 4(23), pp. 4–10 (in Russian).
  3. Atutova Zh. V., Anthropogenically transformed geosystems of the southern part of the Lena-Angara Plateau, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2017, No. 2, pp. 78–86 (in Russian), DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2017-2-78-86.
  4. Batkhiev A. M., Bekov A. B., Dobrieva F. M.-B., Main trends of anthropogenic impact on mountain ecosystems (on the example of Ingushetia), Refleksiya, 2017, No. 1, pp. 6–11 (in Russian).
  5. Beshentsev A. N., Geoinformation support of natural landscape transformation monitoring in the Lake Baikal basin based on retrospective cartographic materials, Aridnye ehkosistemy, 2011, V. 17, No. 4(49), pp. 53–62 (in Russian).
  6. Borisenko E. N., Assessment of anthropogenic transformation of landscapes of the southern part of the Amur-Zeya Plain, Voprosy geografii Verkhnego Priamur’ya, 2015, No. 4, pp. 8–15 (in Russian).
  7. Vladimirov I. N., Anthropogenic disturbance and dynamics of geosystems of Baikal Siberia, Priroda Vnutrennei Azii, 2018, No. 1(6), pp. 19–30 (in Russian), DOI: 10.18101/2542-0623-2018-1-19-30.
  8. Vodop’yanova D. S., Skripchinskaya E. A., Nefedova M. V., Didenko P. A., Anthropogenic transformation and natural potential of landscapes of Apanasenkovsky distric, Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii, 2018, No. 1, pp. 103–116 (in Russian).
  9. Gorokhov A. N., Mapping anthropogenic transformation of landscapes in Yakutia, Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova. Seriya: Nauki o Zemle, 2022, No. 1(25), pp. 19–28 (in Russian), DOI: 10.25587/SVFU.2022.25.1.010.
  10. Gusev A. P., Anthropogenic transformation of landscapes and vegetation succession, Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkologiya i prirodopol’zovanie, 2015, V. 1, No. 2, pp. 103–110 (in Russian).
  11. Gusev A. P., Remote sensing indicators of forest geosystem degradation in south-eastern Belarus, Vestsi BDPU. Seryya 3. Fizika. Matehmatyka. Infarmatyka. Biyalogiya. Geagrafiya, 2020, No. 1(103), pp. 46–50 (in Russian).
  12. Elsakov V. V., Schanov V. M., Satellite data in analysis of changes in ecosystems of the Vychegda River basin, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2016, V. 13, No. 4, pp. 135–145 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2016-13-4-135-145.
  13. Zanozin V. V., Barmin A. N., Valov M. V., Application of GIS and remote sensing data for assessment of anthropogenic transformation of the territory, Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova. Seriya: Nauki o Zemle, 2020, No. 1(17), pp. 27–37 (in Russian), DOI: 10.25587/SVFU.2020.17.61131.
  14. Isachenko A. G., Landshaftovedenie i fiziko-geograficheskoe raionirovanie (Landscape science and physiographical zoning), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1991, 366 p. (in Russian).
  15. Istomina E. A., Methodology for assessment of vegetation disturbance in the Southern Pribaikals using space images and landscape map, Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Nauki o Zemle, 2017, V. 21, pp. 59–67 (in Russian).
  16. Kalinchuk I. V., Mikhailov V. A., Pozachenyuk E. A., Assessment of anthropogenic transformation of landscapes of flat Crimea, Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki, 2016, No. 25(246), pp. 156–168 (in Russian).
  17. Klimina E. M., Ostroukhov A. V., Main stages of the development of landscape-typological map of the northern Sikhote-Alin (Khabarovsk Region), Vestnik Dal’nevostochnogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2016, No. 5(189), pp. 78–85 (in Russian).
  18. Kornienko S. G., Peculiarities of vegetation transformation in the territory of the Urengoy oil and gas condensate field, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2009, V. 6, No. 2, pp. 394–399 (in Russian).
  19. Kochurov B. I., Geoehkologiya: ehkodiagnostika i ehkologo-khozyaistvennyi balans territorii (Geoecology: ecodiagnostics and ecological-economic balance of the territory), Smolensk: SGU, 1999, 154 p. (in Russian).
  20. Kurbatova I. E., Vereshchaka T. V., Ivanova A. A., Space-based monitoring of bog landscape transformation under anthropogenic impacts, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2021, V. 18, No. 4, pp. 216–227 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2021-18-4-216-227.
  21. Lavrinenko I. A., Map of anthropogenic disturbance of the vegetation cover of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2018, V. 15, No. 2, pp. 128–136 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-2-128-136.
  22. Martsinkevich G. I., Schastnaya I. I., Gagina N. V., Bakarasov V. A., Usova I. P., Anthropogenic transformation of landscapes in problematic regions of Belarus, Prirodopol’zovanie, 2010, No. 18, pp. 55–63 (in Russian).
  23. Nikolaishvili D. A., Integrated assessment of anthropogenic transformation of landscapes in Georgia, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2008, No. 2, pp. 112–115 (in Russian).
  24. Ontikov P. V., Shchepashchenko D. G., Karminov V. N., Dyurauer M., Martynenko O. V., Dynamics of tree plantation areas in the Moscow region for 2000–2013, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa — Lesnoi vestnik, 2016, V. 20, No. 1, pp. 184–188 (in Russian).
  25. Osipov S. V., Gurov A. A., Geo-ecological assessment and monitoring of the territory: technology based on landscape mapping of anthropogenic geocomplexes, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle, 2022, V. 67, No. 4, pp. 631–651 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21638/spbu07.2022.405.
  26. Ostroukhov A. V., Application of SRTM 4.1 radar survey data and their derivatives for creation of geomorphological basis of landscape-inventory maps, Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Geodeziya i aerofotosʺemka, 2018, V. 62, No. 1, pp. 45–51, DOI: 10.30533/0536-101X-2018-62-1-45-51 (in Russian).
  27. Ostroukhov A. V., Klimina E. M., Landscape mapping of hard-to-reach territories using geoinformation technologies (on the example of specially protected territories of Khabarovsk Territory), Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2020, V. 17, No 1, pp. 139–149, DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2020-17-1-139-149 (in Russian).
  28. Ostroukhov A. V., Klimina E. M., Kuptsova V. A., Landscape mapping of hard-to-reach areas on the example of the Bolonsky State Nature Reserve (Russia), Nature Conservation Research. Zapovednaya nauka, 2020, V. 5, No. 2, pp. 47–63 (in Russian), DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2020.015.
  29. Purekhovskii A. Zh., Gunya A. N., Kolbovskii E. Yu., Dynamics of high-mountain landscapes of the North Caucasus according to remote sensing data in 2000–2020, Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Estestvennye i tochnye nauki, 2022, V. 16, No. 2, pp. 72–84 (in Russian), DOI: 10.31161/1995-0675-2022-16-2-72-84.
  30. Ryabchikov A. M., Struktura i dinamika geosfery. Ee estestvennoe razvitie i izmenenie chelovekom (The structure and dynamics of the geosphere. Its natural development and human modification), Moscow: Mysl’, 1972, 224 p. (in Russian).
  31. Sokolov A. S., Transformation of landscapes of Grodno region and their conservation in the system of protected areas, Samarskaya Luka: problemy regional’noi i global’noi ehkologii, 2017, V. 26, No. 3, pp. 94–97 (in Russian).
  32. Strel’tsova M. M., Arkhipova O. E., Study of the state of forests in Rostov region using modern geoinformation technologies, Ehkologiya. Ehkonomika. Informatika. Seriya: Geoinformatsionnye tekhnologii i kosmicheskii monitoring, 2021, V. 2, No. 6, pp. 100–109 (in Russian), DOI: 10.23885/2500-123X-2021-2-6-100-109.
  33. Surkov V. V., Zavadskii A. S., Tuzova E. A., Technogenic transformation of the Lena River floodplain near Yakutsk and assessment of its landscape disturbance, Prirodnye resursy Arktiki i Subarktiki, 2024, V. 29, No. 2, pp. 235–247 (in Russian), DOI: 10.31242/2618-9712-2024-29-2-235-247.
  34. Terekhin E. A., Estimation of forest ecosystems disturbance in the southwest of Central Russian Upland using remote sensing data, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2017, V. 14, No. 4, pp. 112–124 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2017-14-4-112-124.
  35. Ukhatina A. Yu., Kurganovich K. A., Analysis of spatial dynamics of forest vegetation loss in the territory of the Zabaikalsky Krai for the period 2001–2020 using remotely sensed data, Bezopasnost’ — 2023: Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Chita, 3–5 maya 2023 goda (Security — 2023: Proc. All-Russian scientific and practical conf., Chita, May 3–5, 2023), Chita: Zabaikal’skii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2023, pp. 28–33 (in Russian).
  36. Chendev Yu. G., Petin A. N., Serikova E. V., Kramchaninov N. N., Degradation of geosystems in the Belgorod region as a result of economic activity, Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2008, No. 4, pp. 69–75 (in Russian).
  37. Shchepashchenko D. G., Shvidenko A. Z., Lesiv M. Yu., Ontikov P. V., Shchepashchenko M. V., Kraksner F., Russian forest area and its dynamics based on synthesis of remote sensing products, Lesovedenie, 2015, No. 3, pp. 163–171 (in Russian).
  38. Batar A. K., Watanabe T., Kumar A., Assessment of land-use/land-cover change and forest fragmentation in the Garhwal Himalayan region of India, Environments, 2017, V. 4, Iss. 2, Article 34, https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4020034.
  39. Biratu A. A., Bedadi B., Gebrehiwot S. G. et al., Ecosystem service valuation along landscape transformation in central Ethiopia, Land, 2022, V. 11, Iss. 4, Article 500, https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040500.
  40. Chakma M., Hayat U., Meng J., Hassan M. A., An assessment of landscape and land use/cover change and its implications for sustainable landscape management in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh, Land, 2023, V. 12, Iss. 8, Article 1610, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081610.
  41. Cheng Y., Song W., Yu H. et al., Assessment and prediction of landscape ecological risk from land use change in Xinjiang, China, Land, 2023, V. 12, Iss. 4, Article 895, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040895.
  42. Cornejo-Denman L., Romo-Leon J. R., Hartfield K. et al., Landscape dynamics in an iconic watershed of Northwestern Mexico: Vegetation condition insights using Landsat and PlanetScope data, Remote Sensing, 2020, V. 12, Iss. 16, Article 2519, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162519.
  43. Galiatsatos N., Donoghue D. N. M., Watt P. et al., An assessment of global forest change datasets for national forest monitoring and reporting, Remote Sensing, 2020, V. 12, Iss. 11, Article 1790, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111790.
  44. Hansen M. C., Potapov P. V., Moore R., Hancher M., Turubanova S. A., Tyukavina A., Thau D., Stehman S. V., Goetz S. J., Loveland T. R., Kommareddy A., Egorov A., Chini L., Justice C. O., Townshend J. R. G., High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change, Science, 2013, V. 342, Iss. 6160, pp. 850–853.
  45. Latorre-Cárdenas M. C., González-Rodríguez A., Godínez-Gómez O. et al., Estimating fragmentation and connectivity patterns of the temperate forest in an avocado-dominated landscape to propose conservation strategies, Land, 2023, V. 12, Iss. 3, Article 631, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030631.
  46. Mirzekhanova Z. G., Ostroukhov A. V., Transformation of natural systems disturbed by gold placer mining in the Khabarovsk Territory, J. Mining Science, 2018, V. 54, No. 3, pp. 435–443, DOI: 10.1134/S1062739118033834.
  47. Musavandalo C. M., Sambieni K. R., Mweru J.-P. M. et al., Land cover dynamics in the northwestern Virunga landscape: An analysis of the past two decades in a dynamic economic and security context, Land, 2024, V. 13, Iss. 5, Article 566, https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050566.