Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2024, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 87-98

Anomalous variations in total electron content in the ionosphere and geodynamic conditions for the 7-magnitude Uchturpan earthquake of January 22, 2024

S.A. Imashev 1 , S.I. Kuzikov 1 
1 Research Station RAS in Bishkek City, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Accepted: 04.07.2024
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-4-87-98
This study presents an analysis of geological-geophysical conditions and anomalous variations in the Total Electron Content (TEC) in the ionosphere for the Uchturpan earthquake (January 22, 2024, 18:09 UTC). The epicenter of the main seismic event was located 50 km west of the settlement of Uchturpan, near the junction of the southern boundary of the Tien-Shan Mountains and the Tarim Basin. One of the nodal planes of the fault in the hypocenter has an average strike at an azimuth of 235°, a northwest dip at an angle of 44°, and a slip direction of 46° from the horizontal. The focal mechanism characteristics and the hypocenter position of the main shock closely match the geological-geodetic parameters of the Maidan left-lateral thrust fault. The aftershock swarm forms a region about 25 km wide and stretches 60 km in a northeast direction. For the analysis of pre- and co-seismic TEC variations, global maps of TEC distribution from Jet Propulsion Laboratory data analysis center were processed. The TEC analysis over the epicenter of the main event showed an increase in values after January 9, 2024, reaching an extreme value after the main shock on January 22, 2024, against the background of diurnal periodicity with peaks in the interval of 05:00–09:00 UTC. Minor variations of the Dst index for January 2024 indicate that the observed anomalous TEC values are not a result of magnetic storms. Maps of the spatial distribution of TEC z-scores before the main event (January 9, 2024) and after it (January 23, 2024) showed the presence of anomalous variations, localized in space and time. The position of the anomalous zone after the main event had an elongated shape along the Maidan fault and the aftershock swarm zone.
Keywords: earthquake, Uchturpan, total electron content, anomalies, Maidan fault
Full text

References:

  1. Abdyraeva B., Maldybaeva M., Sabirova G., The focal mechanism of the main shock of the earthquake on January 22, 2024 (MPV = 6.9), China, Vestnik Instituta Seysmologii NAN KR, 2024, No. 1(23), pp. 8–14 (in Russian), DOI: 10.52179/1694-7290_2024_23.
  2. Wegener A., Proiskhozhdenie kontinentov i okeanov (The origin of continents and oceans), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984, 285 p.
  3. Geological map of the Tien Shan Mountains of China and adjacent areas M 1:1,000,000, Van Khunlyan, Syuy Syueyi (Eds.), Beijin: Land Resources Press, 2007 (in Chinese).
  4. Geologicheskaya karta Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki M 1:500 000 (Geological map of the Kyrgyz Republic M 1:500,000), Tursungaziev B. T., Petrov O. V. (Eds.), Moscow: Kartograficheskaya fabrika VSEGEI, 2008 (in Russian).
  5. Gubin I. E., Seismotektonika i seismoraionirovanie, Tektonika Tyan’-Shanya i Pamira (Seismotectonics and seismic zoning: Tectonics of Tien Shan and Pamir), Moscow: Nauka, 1983, pp. 9–24 (in Russian).
  6. Imashev S. A., Sverdlik L. G., Atmospheric and ionospheric anomalies preceding a strong equatorial earthquake in Sumatra, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 318–327 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-4-318-327.
  7. Sverdlik L. G., Imashev S. A., On preseismic anomalies of atmosphere temperature, Geosistemy perekhodnykh zon, 2019, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19–26 (in Russian), DOI: 10.30730/2541-8912.2019.3.1.019-026.
  8. Sverdlik L. G., Imashev S. A., Spatial-temporal distribution of atmospheric perturbations before strong earthquakes in Tien-Shan, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2020, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 114–122 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2020-17-5-114-122.
  9. Sokolova I. N., Gabsatarova I. P., Beryozina A. V. et al., Large earthquake on January 22, 2024 with Mw = 7.0 in the south of Tien Shan, Rossiiskii seismologicheskii zhurnal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 42–64 (in Russian), DOI: 10.35540/2686-7907.2024.1.03.
  10. Tertyshnikov A., Bolshakov V., Ionosphere monitoring technology using the signal receiver of navigation SV GPS/GLONASS (Galileo), Information and Space, 2010, No. 1, pp. 100–105 (in Russian).
  11. Hernández-Pajares M., Juan J., Sanz J. et al., The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998, J. Geodesy, 2009, Vol. 83, Issue 3–4, pp. 263–275, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1.
  12. Kuzikov S. I., The ratio of tectonic structure and modern movements of the crust in area of geodynamic proving ground in Bishkek, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, Vol. 324, Article 012011, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/324/1/012011.
  13. Molnar P. Tapponnier P., Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision, Science, 1975, Vol. 189, Issue 4201, pp. 419–426.
  14. Oikonomou C., Haralambous H., Pulinets S. et al., Investigation of pre-earthquake ionospheric and atmospheric disturbances for three large earthquakes in Mexico, Geosciences, 2021, Vol. 11, Issue 1, Article 16, 28 p., DOI: 10.3390/geosciences11010016.
  15. Qiao X., Yu P., Nie Z. et al., The Crustal Deformation Revealed by GPS and InSAR in the Northwest Corner of the Tarim Basin, Northwestern China, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2017, Vol. 174, Iss. 3, pp. 1405–1423, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-017-1473-6.
  16. Yao Y. B., Chen P., Wu H. et al., Analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the 2011 Mw = 9.0 Japan earthquake, Chinese Science Bull., 2012, Vol. 57, pp. 500–510, DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4851-y.
  17. Zhou Y., He J., Oimahmadov I. et al., Present-day crustal motion around the Pamir Plateau from GPS measurements, Gondwana Research, 2016, Vol. 35, pp. 144–54, DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.03.011.