Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2024, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 66-75

Simulation of sunlight reflection by a sea surface with a truncated Gram–Charlier distribution

A.S. Zapevalov 1 
1 Marine Hydrophysical Institute RAS, Sevastopol, Russia
Accepted: 04.12.2023
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-1-66-75
When modeling the reflection of light from the sea surface, a representation of the distribution of its slopes using truncated Gram–Charlier series is traditionally used. Gram–Charlier series contain polynomial multipliers, and a small number of terms of the series lead to distortions on the tails of the distribution. The errors of approximation of the probability density function of sea surface slopes associated with the appearance of negative values, as well as with the appearance of local extremes, are considered. For the analysis, the coefficients of the series calculated from remote sensing data by an optical scanner installed on the spacecraft are used. These coefficients differ from the previously obtained coefficients calculated from aerial photographs of the sun glitter. The boundary of the range of acceptable slope values is determined, within which the approximation of the probability density is positive and has no additional extremes. It is established that additional extremes can appear only in the region of negative values of the approximation of the probability density function. It is shown that the slope components oriented across the wind direction always lie in the range of acceptable values. The boundaries of the range of acceptable values for the upwind component of slopes change with changes in wind speed. At wind speeds up to 7 m/s, all values of the upwind component of slopes lie in the range of acceptable values, at higher wind speeds, they can extend beyond this area. In conclusion, the necessity of constructing a model free from the limitations inherent in approximations based on truncated Gram–Charlier series is noted.
Keywords: sea surface, bidirectional reflectance distribution function, slopes, statistical moments, Gram–Charlier distribution
Full text

References:

  1. Zapevalov A. S., Lebedev N. E., Simulation of the sea surface statistical characteristics at the remote sensing in the optical range, Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 2014, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 487–492, DOI: 10.1134/S1024856014060220.
  2. Zapevalov A. S., Ratner Yu. B., Analytic model of the probability density of slopes of the sea surface, Physical Oceanography, 2003, Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 1–13, DOI: 10.1023/A:1022444703787.
  3. Kendall M. J., Stewart A., The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 1. Distribution theory, London: Butler and Tanner Ltd, 1958, 675 p.
  4. Lebedev N. E., Determination of wind speed and degree of contamination of the sea surface by radiation measured by satellite optical scanners in the area of sun glint, Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost’ pribrezhnoi i shel’fovoi zon i kompleksnoe ispol’zovanie resursov shel’fa, 2013, Issue 27, pp. 49–54 (in Russian).
  5. Lebedev N. E., Pustovoitenko V. V., Pokazeev K. V., Melnikova O. N., Simulation of the sea surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2014, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 310–320 (in Russian).
  6. Pustovoitenko V. V., Lebedev N. E., Comparison of sea surface slope statistical moments obtained by means of optical scanners and laser inclinometers, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2015, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 102–109 (in Russian).
  7. Sobolev V. V., Light Scattering in Planetary Atmospheres, Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press, 1975, 256 p.
  8. Fedorov S. V., Stanichny S. V., Satellite-derived bathymetry in the coastal zone of the Black Sea from remote sensing reflectance, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 39–49 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-1-39-49.
  9. Finenko Z. Z., Kovaleva I. V., Suslin V. V., A New Approach to Estimate Phytoplankton Biomass and Its Variability in the Black Sea Surface Water Layer Based on Satellite Data, Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii, 2018, Vol. 138, No. 3, pp. 294–307 (in Russian), DOI: 10.7868/S0042132418030079.
  10. Blinnikov S., Moessner R., Expansions for nearly Gaussian distributions, Astronomy and Astrophysics. Suppl. Ser., 1998, Vol. 130, pp. 193–205.
  11. Bréon F. M., Henriot N., Spaceborne observations of ocean glint reflectance and modeling of wave slope distributions, J. Geophysical Research, 2006, Vol. 111, No. C6, Article C06005.
  12. Cavalli R. M., Pignatti S., Zappitelli E., Correction of sun glint effect on MIVIS data of the Sicily Campaign in July 2000, Annals of Geophysics, 2006, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 277–286.
  13. Cox C., Munk W. (1954a), Measurements of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun glitter, J. Optical Society of America, 1954, Vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 838–850.
  14. Cox C., Munk W. (1954b), Statistics of the sea surface derived from the sun glitter, J. Marine Research, 1954, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 198–227.
  15. Kay S., Hedley J. D., Lavender S., Sun glint correction of high and low spatial resolution images of aquatic scenes: a review of methods for visible and near-infrared wavelengths, Remote Sensing, 2009, No. 1, pp. 697–730.
  16. Kwon O. K., Analytic expressions for the positive definite and unimodal regions of Gram–Charlier series, Communications in Statistics — Theory and Methods, 2020, Vol. 51, pp. 5064–5084, DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1833219.
  17. Lebedev N. E., Zapevalov A. S., Characteristic geometric features of the sun glint on the sea surface for satellite optical measurements, 24 th Intern. Symp. Atmospheric and Ocean Optics: Atmospheric Physics, Proc. SPIE, 2018, Vol. 10833, Article 108334J, DOI: 10.1117/12.2504235.
  18. Tatarskii V. I., Multi-Gaussian representation of the Cox–Munk distribution for slopes of wind-driven waves, J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2003, Vol. 20, pp. 1697–1705, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1697:MROTCD>2.0.CO;2.
  19. Wald L., Monget J. M., Sea surface winds from sun glitter observations, J. Geophysical Research, 1983, Vol. 88, No. C4, pp. 2547–2555.