Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2019, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 75-83

Experience of digital elevation modeling for the identification of inheritance of foundation structures in modern relief of the northern part of Russian Plate

E.V. Polyakova 1 , Yu.G. Kutinov 1, 2 , Z.B. Chistova 1 , A.L. Mineev 1 
1 N.P. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research RAS, Arkhangelsk, Russia
2 Space Monitoring Center of the Arctic NARFU, Arkhangelsk, Russia
Accepted: 13.03.2019
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-2-75-83
There is an opinion that the formed relief of the north of the East European Platform is quite young and does not reflect its tectonic structure. However, the fundamentally new position that the East European Platform, as a single structure of the first kind, is not tectonically passive, but rather mobile, especially in its marginal parts, necessitates taking into account structural and tectonic factors when analyzing the appearance of the modern relief. Ambiguous, but the existing connection of surface processes with deep processes makes us study more closely and use the results of regional in-depth studies. This article assessed the nature of the inheritance of basement structures in the modern relief of the North of the Russian Plate. The possibility of applying digital elevation modeling in structural and geological studies is shown. Based on the comparison of the digital model of the relief of the foundation and the digital model of the surface, the forms of the manifestation of the structures of the foundation in the modern relief of the Arkhangelsk region are highlighted. 61 % of the territory has the direct character of inheritance, the reverse ― 25 %, areas where the inheritance does not manifest, correspond to 14 % of the territory of the region. In addition, it was found that the manifestation of kimberlite magmatism and areas of likely localization of oil and gas fields are confined to increases on the surface and correspond to the direct forms of reflection of the basement structures in the modern relief, which are more protruding to the “high-high” type. The results are preliminary and require further detailed study.
Keywords: northern part of Russian plate, digital elevation model, foundation structures, direct and reverse forms of inheritance
Full text

References:

  1. Bilibina T. V., Blokovaya tektonika i geodinamika zemnoi kory severo-zapada Russkoi platformy i printsipy prognozirovaniya rudonosnykh struktur (Block tectonics and geodynamics of the crust of the north-west of the Russian Platform and principles for predicting ore-bearing structures), Blokovaya tektonika i perspektivy rudonosnosti Russkoi platformy, Leningrad: VSEGEI, 1986, pp. 22–29.
  2. Gil’manova G. Z., Rybas O. V., Goroshko M. V., Primenenie preobrazovannykh tsifrovykh modelei rel’efa dlya geologo-strukturnogo raionirovaniya krupnykh blokov zemnoi kory (The use of transformed digital elevation models for geological and structural zoning of large blocks of the earth’s crust), Tikhookeanskaya geologiya, 2011, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 34–43.
  3. Gubaidullin M. G., Geoekologicheskie usloviya osvoeniya mineral’no-syr’evykh resursov Evropeiskogo Severa Rossii (Geoenvironmental conditions for the development of mineral resources in the European North of Russia), Arkhangelsk: Pomorskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. M. V. Lovonosova, 2002, 310 p.
  4. Dmitrievskaya T. V., Ryabukhina S. G., Dvoretskii P. I., Ponomarev V. A., Zaitsev V. A., Vliyanie struktury poverkhnosti fundamenta na kharakter raspredeleniya neftyanykh i gazovykh mestorozhdenii Timano-Pechorskogo basseina (Influence of the structure of the basement surface on the nature of the distribution of oil and gas fields in the Timan-Pechora basin), Geologiya nefti i gaza, 2000, No. 4, pp. 56–58.
  5. Ermolaev O. P., Semenov F. V., Ispol’zovanie tsifrovykh modelei rel’efa dlya morfometricheskogo analiza tektonicheskikh struktur i poiska rossypei allyuvial’nogo genezisa (The use of digital elevation models for morphometric analysis of tectonic structures and search for alluvial placers alluvial), Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2014, No. 1, pp. 142–147.
  6. Zaitsev V. A., Zlatopol’skii A. A., Panina L. V., Sovremennyi rel’ef Skifskoi plity kak otrazhenie deformatsii fundamenta (Modern relief of the Scythian plate as a reflection of the deformation of the foundation), Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta,Ser. 4: Geologiya, 2013, No. 6, pp. 13–18.
  7. Zlatopol’skii A. A., Mul’timasshtabnyi analiz tsifrovoi modeli rel’efa. Eksperimental’nye zakonomernosti (Multiscale digital elevation model analysis. Experimental patterns), Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2015, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 27–35.
  8. Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Ierarkhicheskii ryad proyavlenii kimberlitovogo magmatizma Arkhangelskoi almazonosnoi provintsii. Ikh otrazhenie v geologo-geofizicheskikh materialakh (A hierarchical series of manifestations of kimberlite magmatism of the Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province. Their reflection in geological and geophysical materials), Arkhangelsk: OAO “IPP Pravda Severa”, 2004, 284 p.
  9. Litosfera i gidrosfera evropeiskogo Severa Rossii. Geoekologicheskie problemy (Lithosphere and hydrosphere of the European North of Russia. Geoecological problems), F. N. Yudakhin (ed.), Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN, 2001, 408 p.
  10. Mineev A. L., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Polyakova E. V. (2015a), Podgotovka tsifrovoi modeli rel’efa dlya issledovaniya ekzogennykh protsessov severnykh territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Preparation of a digital elevation model for the study of exogenous processes in the northern territories of the Russian Federation), Prostranstvo i Vremya, 2015, No. 3(21), pp. 278–291.
  11. Mineev A. L., Polyakova E. V., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B. (2015b), Metodicheskie aspekty sozdaniya tsifrovoi modeli rel’efa Arkhangelskoi oblasti na osnove ASTER GDEM V. 2 (Methodical aspects of creating a digital elevation model of the Arkhangelsk region based on ASTER GDEM V. 2), Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015, No. 2, available at: www.science-education.ru/129-21949.
  12. Mineev A. L., Polyakova E. V., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Nadezhnost’ tsifrovoi modeli rel’efa Arkhangelskoi oblasti dlya provedeniya geoekologicheskikh issledovanii (The reliability of a digital elevation model of the Arkhangelsk region for geoecological research), Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2018, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 58–67, available at: https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-4-58-67.
  13. Morozov A. N., Vaganova N. V., Asming V. E., Mikhailova Ya. A., Seismichnost’ Severa Russkoi plity: utochnenie parametrov gipotsentrov sovremennykh zemletryasenii (Seismicity of the North of the Russian Plate: specification of the parameters of hypocenters of modern earthquakes), Fizika Zemli, 2018, No. 2, pp. 104–123.
  14. Ryabukhina S. G., Dmitrievskaya T. V., Zaitsev V. A., Perspektivy neftegazonosnosti Mezenskoi sineklizy po neotektonicheskim dannym (Oil and gas potential of the Mezen syneclise according to neotectonic data), Geologiya nefti i gaza, 1997, No. 6, pp. 16–21.
  15. Timurziev A. I., Noveishaya tektonika i neftegazonosnost’ zapada Turanskoi plity (The latest tectonics and oil and gas potential of the west of the Turan plate), Geologiya nefti i gaza, 2006, No. 1, pp. 35–44.