Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2011, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 137-149

The Earth radiation budget and climate sensitivity: diagnostics and geoengineering

V.A. Golovko 
Scientific Research Center of Space Hydrometeorology Planet, 123242 Moscow, B. Predtechensky per., 7
The Earth radiation budget (ERB) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) is a key parameter which measures the energy exchange between the Earths climate system and space. Disturbances of ERB (radiation forcing) determine dynamics of planetary climatic system. Estimations of climate sensitivity based on TOA radiation imbalance are main tool in predicting the global temperature response to radiation forcing. Most projections of future climate scenarios are based on climate sensitivity estimations with respect to various factors. Geoengineering proposals aim to intervene in the climate system by deliberately modifying the Earths energy balance to reduce increases of global temperature.
Keywords: Earth's radiation budget, global warming, radiation forcing, climate sensitivity, geoengineering
Full text

References:

  1. Golovko V.A., Pakhomov L.A., Uspenskii A.B., Meteorologiya i gidrologiya, 2003, No. 12, pp. 56-73.
  2. Golovko V.A., Issledovanie Zemli iz kosmosa, 2003, No. 6, pp. 3-13.
  3. Golovko V.A., Issledovanie Zemli iz kosmosa, 2004, No. 5, pp. 3-14.
  4. Golovko V.A., Kondranin T.V., Izuchenie radiatsionnogo balansa Zemli po dannym kosmicheskogo monitoringa (Study of the radiation balance of the Earth by satellite monitoring data), Moscow: MFTI, 2007, 174 p.
  5. Golovko V.A., Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2010, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 310-320.
  6. Izrael' Yu.A., Ryaboshapko A.G., Petrov N.N., Meteorologiya i gidrologiya, 2009, No. 6, pp. 5-24.
  7. Dessler A.E., SCIENCE, 2010, Vol. 330, 10 December, pp. 523-527.
  8. Golovko V.A., Global Climatology and Ecodynamics: Anthropogenic Driven Changes to Planet Earth, 2008, Springer/Praxis, Chichester, UK, pp. 29-41.
  9. Hansen, J., R. Ruedy, M. Sato, K. Lo, Rev. Geophys., 2010, No. 48, p. RG4004, doi:10.1029/2010RG000345, pp. 1-29.
  10. Keith D.W., Nature, 2010, Vol. 463, 28 January, pp. 426-427.
  11. Keith D.W., PNAS, 2010, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1009519107.
  12. Levitus S., J.I. Antonov, T.P. Boyer, R.A. Locarnini, H.E. Garcia, A.V. Mishonov, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009, No. 36, p. L07608, available at: doi:10.1029/2008GL037155.
  13. K.M. Lugina, P.Ya. Groisman, K.Ya. Vinnikov, V.V. Koknaeva, N.A. Speranskaya, Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, 2006, available at: doi:10.3334/CDIAC/cli.003.
  14. Murphy D.M., Solomon S., Portmann R.W., Rosenlof K.H., Forster P.M., Wong T., J. Geophys. Res., 2009, No. 114, p. D17107, doi:10.1029/2009JD012105.
  15. Roe, G. Baker, M., Science, 2007, No. 318, pp. 629–632.
  16. Schwartz S., J. Geophys. Res., 2007, No. 112, p. D24S05, available at: doi:10.1029/2007/2007JD008746.
  17. Zaliapin I., Ghil M., Nonlin. Processes Geophys, 2010, No. 17, pp. 113–122.