ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2026, V. 23, No. 5, pp. 244-257

Space-temporal analysis of atmospheric perturbations preceding strong earthquakes in the Peru–Chile subduction zone

L.G. Sverdlik 1, 2 
1 Research Station RAS in Bishkek City, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
2 Kyrgyz–Russian Slavic University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Accepted: 02.07.2026
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2026-23-5-244-257
Distinguishing of short-time atmospheric effects preceding strong earthquakes in subduction zones is a crucial task of seismic hazard reduction. The continuous monitoring of atmospheric parameters required to identify pre-seismic anomalies sources remote sensing information contained in the MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2) reanalysis archive. Within the framework of the research, with the use of the ad hoc algorithm IPPLA (Identification of Preseismic Perturbations in the Lower Atmosphere) atmospheric temperature variations have been analyzed and perturbations aligned with processes in the lithosphere have been distinguished. The unique feature of the algorithm is the use of two high altitude ranges in the upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere that are determined on the basis of choice of the most correlated antiphase changes with relatively high intensity of temperature variations. In the present work, atmospheric effects preceding earthquakes of M > 7,0 occurred in 2021-2024 in the Southern Hemisphere, in the south of Peru and in the north of Chile, were considered. Results of thermometry data processing showed a well-pronounced spatial pattern of thermal anomalies in earthquake preparation zones. Mesoscale temperature anomalies characterized by maximum values of the anomalous variations parameter dTC ≥ 2,0 were observed several days before the events. Perturbated temperature areas were situated near earthquake focuses and showed negligible spatial variations while preserving their forms, dimensions and positions over the period of more than 12 hours. As wave processes were considered to be the most probable factor resulting in irregularities of the thermal state in the lower atmosphere potential energy density of gravitational waves was calculated. Overactivity of atmospheric waves probably associated with earthquake preparation was observed near epicenters at heights of 12-17 km. This study may serve as confirmation that the algorithm used was developed not for specific monitoring conditions, but can be applied globally, including analysis of temperature variations both in the seismically active regions of Eurasia and in the subduction zone of South America.
Keywords: satellite measurements, temperature, earthquake, upper troposphere, lower stratosphere, STA/LTA criterion, integral parameter, anomaly, atmospheric gravity wave, potential energy
Full text

References:

  1. Lin’kov E. M., Petrova L. N., Osipov K. Ts., Seismogravitational pulsations of the Earth and atmospheric disturbances as possible precursors of strong earthquakes, Doklady AN SSSR, 1990, V. 313, No. 5, pp. 1095–1098 (in Russian).
  2. Sverdlik L. G., Identification of pre-seismic atmospheric perturbations using modified STA/LTA criterion, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2021, V. 18, No. 3, pp. 141–149 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2021-18-3-141-149.
  3. Sverdlik L. G., Atmospheric effects of the largest earthquakes in the Alpine-Himalayan seismic belt, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, V. 19, No. 2, pp. 81–90 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-2-81-90.
  4. Sverdlik L. G., Dynamics of perturbations in the lower atmosphere in seismically active regions of Asia, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2023, V. 20, No. 2, pp. 144–152 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2023-20-2-144-152.
  5. Sverdlik L. G., Seismic-atmospheric effects in changes in meteorological parameters of the lower atmosphere, according to satellite measurements, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2024, V. 21, No. 2, pp. 122–130 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-2-122-130.
  6. Sverdlik L. G., Pre-seismic disturbances of meteorological parameters in the lower atmosphere based on satellite measurements, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2025, V. 22, No. 1, pp. 56–68 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2025-22-1-56-68.
  7. Sverdlik L. G., Ibraev A. E., Use of the modified STA/LTA algorithm for detection pre-seismic temperature perturbations in the lower atmosphere, Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiiskogo slavyanskogo universiteta, 2022, V. 22, No. 12, pp. 190-196 (in Russian), DOI: 10.36979/1694-500X-2022-22-12-190-196.
  8. Sverdlik L. G., Ibraev A. E., Programma “IPPLA” (Identification of Preseismic Perturbations in the Lower Atmosphere) (Program “IPPLA” (Identification of Preseismic Perturbations in the Lower Atmosphere)), Certificate of state registration of software No. 2023612499 (RU), Reg. 03.02.2023 (in Russian).
  9. Sherman S. I., Zlogodukhova O. G., Seismic belts and zones of the Earth: Formalization of notions, positions in the lithosphere, and structural control, Geodynamics and Tectonophysics, 2011, V. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–34 (in Russian), DOI: 10.5800/GT-2011-2-1-0031.
  10. Arango M. C., Strasser F. O., Bommer J. J. et al., A strong-motion database from the Peru–Chile subduction zone, J. Seismology, 2011, V. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 19–41, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-010-9203-x.
  11. Bilek S. L., Lay T., Subduction zone megathrust earthquakes, Geosphere, 2018, V. 14, No. 4, pp. 1468–1500, DOI: 10.1130/GES01608.1.
  12. Casarotti E., Piersanti A., Postseismic stress diffusion in Chile and South Peru, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2003, V. 206, pp. 325-333, DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01103-2.
  13. Cattiaux J., Douville H., Schoetter R. et al., Projected increase in diurnal and interdiurnal variations of European summer temperatures, Geophysical Research Letters, 2015, V. 42, pp. 899–907, DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062531.
  14. Chen J., Xiong P., Wu H. et al., Pre-seismic anomalies and co-seismic disturbance induced by the 2024 Mw 7.1 Wushi earthquake: multi-GNSS observations and modeling, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2024, V. 15, No. 1, Article 2422024, DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2024.2422024.
  15. Cordaro E. G., Venegas-Aravena P., Laroze D., Long-term magnetic anomalies and their possible relationship to the latest greater Chilean earthquakes in the context of the seismo-electromagnetic theory, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2021, V. 21, pp. 1785–1806, DOI: 10.5194/nhess-21-1785-2021.
  16. Das R., Gonzalez G., de la Llera J. C. et al., A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of southern Peru and Northern Chile, Engineering Geology, 2020, V. 271, Article 105585, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105585.
  17. DeMets C., Gordon R. G., Argus D. F., Geologically current plate motions, Geophysical J. Intern., 2010, V. 181, Iss. 1, pp. 1–80, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04491.x.
  18. Dobrovolsky I. P., Zubkov S. I., Miachkin V. I., Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1979, V. 117, pp. 1025–1044, DOI: 10.1007/BF00876083.
  19. Dong Y., Gao C., Long F., Yan Y., Suspected seismo-ionospheric anomalies before three major earthquakes detected by GIMs and GPS TEC of permanent stations, Remote Sensing, 2022, V. 14, Iss. 1, Article 20, DOI: 10.3390/rs14010020.
  20. Dzambo A. M., Hitchman M. H., Chang K.-W., The influence of gravity waves on ice saturation in the tropical tropopause layer over Darwin, Australia, Atmosphere, 2019, V. 10, Iss. 12, Article 778, DOI: 10.3390/atmos10120778.
  21. Endeshaw L., Investigation of atmospheric anomalies due to the great Tohoku earthquake disturbance using NRLMSISE-00 atmospheric model measurement, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2024, V. 181, pp. 1455–1478, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-024-03476-2.
  22. Hagen M., Azevedo A., South Atlantic anomaly variations during seasons, Natural Science, 2023, V. 15, No. 7, pp. 207-221, DOI: 10.4236/ns.2023.157016.
  23. He L., Heki K., Three-dimensional distribution of ionospheric anomalies prior to three large earthquakes in Chile, Geophysical Research Letters, 2016, V. 43, Iss. 14, pp. 7287-7293, DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069863.
  24. He L., Heki K., Ionospheric anomalies immediately before Mw7.0–8.0 earthquakes, J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2017, V. 122, pp. 8659–8678, DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024012.
  25. Kherani E. A., Sanchez S. A., de Paula E. R., Numerical modeling of coseismic tropospheric disturbances arising from the unstable acoustic gravity wave energetics, Atmosphere, 2021, V. 12, Iss. 6, Article 765, DOI: 10.3390/atmos12060765.
  26. Koravos G., Vougiouka G., Tsapanos T. M. et al., Earthquake hazard along the western coast of South America inferred from conditional probabilities, Bull. Geological Soc. of Greece, 2016, V. 50, pp. 1184–1193, DOI: 10.12681/bgsg.11824.
  27. Kundu S., Bagiya M.S., Investigation of co‐seismic ionospheric perturbations generated by shallow earthquakes in the Chile subduction zone, J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2024, V. 129, Article e2024JA032676, DOI: 10.1029/2024JA032676.
  28. Kundu S., Chowdhury S., Ghosh S. et al., Seismogenic anomalies in atmospheric gravity waves as observed from SABER/TIMED satellite during large earthquakes, Hindawi J. Sensors, 2022, Article 3201104, 23 p., DOI: 10.1155/2022/3201104.
  29. Liu W., Yao H., Rupture process of the 26 May 2019 MW8.0northern Peru intermediate‐depth earthquake and insights into its mechanism, Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, V. 47, Article e2020GL087167, DOI: 10.1029/2020GL087167.
  30. Lovery B., Chlieh M., Norabuena E. et al., Heterogeneous locking and earthquake potential on the South Peru megathrust from dense GNSS network, J. Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2024, V. 129, Article e2023JB027114, DOI: 10.1029/2023JB027114.
  31. Nanda K., Sasmal S., Hazra R. et al., Study on the distribution of Gravity Wave (GW) activity in six Bay of Bengal tropical cyclones, Atmosphere, 2025, V. 16, Iss. 2, Article 235, DOI: 10.3390/ atmos16020235.
  32. Schmidt T., de la Torre A., Wickert J., Global gravity wave activity in the tropopause region from CHAMP radio occultation data, Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, V. 35, Iss. 16, Article L16807, DOI: 10.1029/2008GL034986.