ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2026. Т. 23. № 3. С. 96-108

Effectiveness of methods for extracting ground surface temperature from Landsat data for northern Siberian landscapes

A.A. Karsakov 1 , E.I. Ponomarev 1 
1 Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Accepted: 25.03.2026
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2026-23-3-96-108
Land Surface Temperature (LST) is a critical parameter that is derived from remote sensing data and is frequently employed to evaluate the condition of natural ecosystem components and heat exchange processes within the soil–vegetation–atmosphere system. This study evaluates the efficiency of various LST retrieval methods using multi-year Landsat data. In northern Siberia, the characteristic landscapes of the cryolithozone were analyzed based on the observed LST ranges. The findings show that for natural landscapes, techniques based on the Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) have high internal consistency (mean coefficient of variation CV = 4.2…6.8%; median shift ≤1.2 °C). The degree of uncertainty increases substantially for the “Infrastructure” class (CV = 12.4…15.7%), which is attributed to limitations of NDVI-dependent land surface emissivity (LSE) models when applied to intrazonal land cover types (NDVI = 0.21…0.48). The Quantum Geographic Information Systems (QGIS) Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin (SCP) employs a method that consistently underestimates LST values in comparison to RTE-based approaches (up to –40% in 2022). This suggests that the built-in LSE model is not suitable for cryolithozone landscapes. The Sobrino et al. method (Sobrino et al., 2008), in conjunction with alternative RTE-based approaches to quantify uncertainty levels, was found to be the most effective method for monitoring the thermal dynamics of industrially transformed landscapes under Arctic conditions. The utilization of QGIS SCP necessitates preliminary calibration with local reference data. The findings can be employed to enhance satellite data processing algorithms for environmental monitoring in northern Siberian landscapes.
Keywords: Land Surface Temperature, LST, satellite imagery, underlying surface, landscape, cryolithozone, post-industrial transformation of landscape, oil and gas complex
Full text

References:

  1. Anisimov O. A., Zhirkov A. F., Sherstyukov A. B., Contemporary changes of the cryosphere and natural environment in the Arctic, Arktika. XXI vek. Estestvennye nauki, 2015, No. 2 (3), pp. 24–47 (in Russian).
  2. Gorny V. I., Brovkina O. V., Kiselev A. V., Tronin A. A., Trends in remote sensing methods for geological and environmental applications, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2023, V. 20, No. 2, pp. 9–38 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2023-20-2-9-38.
  3. Kaverin D. A., Lapteva E. M., Shchanov V. M. et al., Climatic geoinformation analysis of the cryolithozone in the northeast of European Russia, Earth’s Cryosphere, 2019, V. 23, No. 4, pp. 68–78 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21782/KZ1560-7496-2019-4(68-78).
  4. Karsakov A. A., Ponomarev E. I., Remote monitoring of the thermal condition of underlying surface under the conditions of anthropogenic transformation, Biosfera, 2024, V. 16, No. 1, pp. 20–29 (in Russian).
  5. Kobysheva N. V., Akentyeva E. M., Bogdanova E. G., Karpenko V. N., Klyueva M. V., Lipovskaya V. N., Lugina K. M., Razova E. N., Semenov Yu. A., Stadnik E. V., Khafizullin K. Sh., Klimat Rossii: monografiya (Climate of Russia: Monograph), N. V. Kobysheva (ed.), Saint Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 2001, 654 p. (in Russian).
  6. Matishov G. G., Dzhenyuk S. L., Moiseev D. V., Climate and large marine ecosystems of the Arctic, Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2017, V. 87, No. 2, pp. 110–120 (in Russian), DOI: 10.7868/S0869587317020086.
  7. Trofimova I. E., Balybina A. S., Zoning of the West Siberian Plain by thermal regime of soils, Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2015, No. 3, pp. 27–38 (in Russian).
  8. Yakimov N. D., Ponomarev E. I., Ponomareva T. V., Variation in spectral indices in the context of natural and technogenic transformations of landscapes, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2024, V. 21, No. 4, pp. 131–140 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-4-131-140.
  9. Becker F., Li Z.-L., Towards a local split window method over land surfaces, Intern. J. Remote Sensing, 1990, V. 11, No. 3, pp. 369–393, DOI: 10.1080/01431169008955028.
  10. Congalton R. G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991, V. 37, No. 1, pp. 35–46, DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B.
  11. Congedo L., Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin: A Python tool for the download and processing of remote sensing images in QGIS, J. Open Source Software, 2021, V. 6, No. 64, Article 3172, DOI: 10.21105/joss.03172.
  12. Li S., Jiang G.-M., Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat-8 data with the generalized split-window algorithm, IEEE Access, 2018, V. 6, pp. 18149–18162, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2818767.
  13. Li Z.-L., Tang B.-H., Wu H. et al., Satellite-derived land surface temperature: Current status and perspectives, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, V. 131, pp. 14–37, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.008.
  14. Ponomareva T. V., Litvintsev K. Y., Finnikov K. A. et al., The variability in the thermophysical properties of soils for sustainability of the industrial-affected zone of the Siberian Arctic, Sustainability, 2025, V. 17, No. 19, Article 8892, DOI: 10.3390/su17198892.
  15. Sayler K., Zanter K., Landsat 8 Collection 2 (C2) Level 2 Science Product (L2SP) Guide. Version 2.0, Sioux Falls, South Dakota: U. S. Geological Survey, 2020, 43 p.
  16. Sekertekin A., Bonafoni S., Land Surface Temperature retrieval from Landsat 5, 7, and 8 over rural areas: Assessment of different retrieval algorithms and emissivity models and toolbox implementation, Remote Sensing, 2020, V. 12, No. 2, Article 294, DOI: 10.3390/rs12020294.
  17. Skoković D., Sobrino J. A., Jiménez-Muñoz J. C., Soria G., Julien Y., Mattar C., Cristobal J., Calibration and validation of land surface temperature for Landsat-8 TIRS sensor, Proc. ESA/ESRIN Workshop: Land Product Validation Evolution, Frascati: ESA/ESRIN, 2014, V. 27, pp. 6–9.
  18. Sobrino J. A., Jiménez-Muñoz J. C., Sòria G. et al., Land surface emissivity retrieval from different VNIR and TIR sensors, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2008, V. 46, No. 2, pp. 316–327, DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.904834.
  19. Tucker C. J., Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation, Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, V. 8, No. 2, pp. 127–150, DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.
  20. Valor E., Caselles V., Mapping land surface emissivity from NDVI: Application to European, African, and South American areas, Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, V. 57, No. 3, pp. 167–184, DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00039-9.
  21. Walker D. A., Raynolds M. K., Daniëls F. J. A. et al., The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map, J. Vegetation Science, 2005, V. 16, No. 3, pp. 267–282, DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02365.x.
  22. Wan Z., Dozier J., A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, V. 34, No. 4, pp. 892–905, DOI: 10.1109/36.508406.
  23. Yu X., Guo X., Wu Z., Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 TIRS—Comparison between radiative transfer equation-based method, split window algorithm and single channel method, Remote Sensing, 2014, V. 6, No. 10, pp. 9829–9852, DOI: 10.3390/rs6109829.
  24. Zhirkov A., Sivtsev M., Lytkin V. et al., An assessment of the possibility of restoration and protection of territories disturbed by thermokarst in Central Yakutia, Eastern Siberia, Land, 2023, V. 12, Article 197, DOI: 10.3390/land12010197.
  25. Zhou D., Xiao J., Bonafoni S. et al., Satellite remote sensing of surface urban heat islands: Progress, challenges, and perspectives, Remote Sensing, 2019, V. 11, No. 1, Article 48, DOI: 10.3390/rs11010048.