ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2026, V. 23, No. 2, pp. 385-397

Estimation of the total electron content distribution correlation scale in the European region using a variogram approach based on GNSS radio sounding data

I.A. Pavlov 1, 2 , A.M. Padokhin 1, 2 
1 Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS, Troitsk, Moscow, Russia
2 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Accepted: 10.02.2026
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2026-23-2-385-397
The paper presents a method for estimating the correlation scale of the ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) distribution using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio sounding data. The method uses data obtained from the Madrigal database to construct empirical variograms of TEC residuals relative to the 27-day median distribution of electron density. The correlation scale was determined by fitting the parameters of a Gaussian variogram model to best match the obtained empirical variograms. Analysis of data from 2018, a year characterized by low solar and geomagnetic activity, showed that in the European region, the TEC correlation scale exhibits seasonal variability, increasing from ~1000 km in winter months to 2000–4000 km in summer, which agrees well with the variability of the Regional Electron Content (REC). From analysis of variogram surfaces, a significant anisotropy of the TEC correlation scale was revealed associated with the directions of magnetic field and neutral wind at the F2 layer peak altitudes. The research results have practical significance for the tasks of adapting ionospheric models and assimilating TEC data for the purpose of forecasting radio wave propagation conditions, as well as for understanding the dynamics of ionospheric processes at midlatitudes.
Keywords: ionosphere, GNSS, correlation scale, variogram
Full text

References:

  1. Bilitza D., Altadill D., Truhlik V. et al., International Reference Ionosphere 2016: From ionospheric climate to real-time weather predictions, Space Weather, 2017, V. 15. No. 2, pp. 418–429, DOI: 10.1002/2016SW001593.
  2. Bust G. S., Immel T. J., IDA4D: Ionospheric data assimilation for the ICON mission, Space Science Reviews, 2020, V. 216, No. 3, Article 33, 17 p., DOI: 10.1007/s11214-020-00648-z.
  3. Bust G. S., Garner T. W., Gaussiran T. L., II, Ionospheric Data Assimilation Three-Dimensional (IDA3D): A global, multisensor, electron density specification algorithm, J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2004, V. 109, No. A11, Article A11312, DOI: 10.1029/2003JA010234.
  4. Drob D. P., Emmert J. T., Meriwether J. W. et al., An update to the Horizontal Wind Model (HWM): The quiet time thermosphere, Earth and Space Science, 2015, V. 2, No. 7, pp. 301–319, DOI: 10.1002/2014EA000089.
  5. Forsythe V. V., Azeem I., Crowley G., Ionospheric horizontal correlation distances: Estimation, analysis, and implications for ionospheric data assimilation, Radio Science, 2020, V. 55, No. 12, Article e2020RS007159, 14 p., DOI: 10.1029/2020RS007159.
  6. Juan J. M., Sanz J., Rovira-Garcia A. et al., AATR an ionospheric activity indicator specifically based on GNSS measurements, J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 2018, V. 8, Article A14, DOI: 10.1051/ swsc/2017044.
  7. Liu A., Li Z., Wang N. et al., Gaussian variogram-based model of total electron content in the regional ionosphere of China, Space Weather, 2024, V. 22, No. 11, Article e2024SW004047, DOI: 10.1029/2024SW004047.
  8. Lv M., Tang Q., Qiao J. et al., Statistical analysis of ionospheric correlation for shortwave system, Radio Science, 2024, V. 59, No. 4, Article e2023RS007893, 12 p., DOI: 10.1029/2023RS007893.
  9. Lyu H., Hernández-Pajares M., Li M. et al., Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging, J. Geodesy, 2024, V. 98, No. 12, Article 104, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01908-4.
  10. Mannucci A. J., Wilson B. D., Yuan D. N. et al., A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements, Radio Science, 1998, V. 33, No. 3, pp. 565–582, DOI: 10.1029/97RS02707.
  11. Nava B., Coïsson P., Radicella S. M., A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model, J. Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2008, V. 70, No. 15, pp. 1856–1862, DOI: 10.1016/j. jastp.2008.01.015.
  12. Oliver M. A., Webster R., A tutorial guide to geostatistics: Computing and modelling variograms and kriging, Catena, 2014, V. 113, pp. 56–69, DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006.
  13. Papitashvili N. E., King J. H., OMNI hourly data set, Heliophysics Digital Resource Library (HDRL) dataset, 2020, DOI: 10.48322/1SHR-HT18.
  14. Pignalberi A., Pezzopane M., Rizzi R., Galkin I., Effective solar indices for ionospheric modeling: A review and a proposal for a real-time regional IRI, Surveys in Geophysics, 2018, V. 39, No. 1, pp. 125–167, DOI: 10.1007/s10712-017-9438-y.
  15. Qiao J., Liu Y., Fan Z. et al., Ionospheric TEC data assimilation based on Gauss–Markov Kalman filter, Advances in Space Research, 2021, V. 68, No. 10, pp. 4189–4204, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.004.
  16. Reid B., Themens D. R., McCaffre A. et al., A-CHAIM: Near-real-time data assimilation of the high latitude ionosphere with a pArticle filter, Space Weather, 2023, V. 21, No. 3, Article e2022SW003185, DOI: 10.1029/2022SW003185.
  17. Rideout W., Coster A., Automated GPS processing for global total electron content data, GPS Solutions, 2006, V. 10, No. 3, pp. 219–228, DOI: 10.1007/s10291-006-0029-5.
  18. Segarra A., Altadill D., de Paula V., Navas-Portella V., Climatology of large-scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances above Europe during the 2014–2023 period, J. Space Weather and Space Climate, 2025, V. 15, Article 28, DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2025024.
  19. Shim J. S., Scherliess L., Schunk R. W., Thompson D. C., Spatial correlations of day-to-day ionospheric total electron content variability obtained from ground-based GPS, J. Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2008, V. 113, No. A9, Article A09309, DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012635.
  20. Tang J., Zhang S., Huo X., Wu X., Ionospheric assimilation of GNSS TEC into IRI model using a local ensemble Kalman filter, Remote Sensing, 2022, V. 14, No. 14, Article 3267, DOI: 10.3390/rs14143267.
  21. Tolstikov M. V., Oinats A. V., Artamonov M. F. et al., Statistical relation of traveling ionospheric disturbances with neutral wind and disturbances in the stratosphere, Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2022, V. 8, No. 4, pp. 78–88, DOI: 10.12737/szf-84202208.
  22. Yasyukevich Y. V., Zatolokin D., Padokhin A. et al., Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC ionospheric models: A comparison in total electron content and positioning domains, Sensors, 2023, V. 23, No. 10, Article 4773, DOI: 10.3390/s23104773.
  23. Yuan L., Hoque M. M., Kodikara T., The four-dimensional variational Neustrelitz Electron Density Assimilation Model: NEDAM, Space Weather, 2023, V. 21, No. 6, Article e2022SW003378, DOI: 10.1029/2022SW003378.