Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2024, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 143-155

Using the NDVI index to assess the development of perennial grasses under conditions of spatial and temporal heterogeneity

A.D. Kirsanov 1 , A.A. Komarov 1 
1 Agrophysical Research Institute, Saint Petersburg, Россия
Accepted: 19.02.2024
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-2-143-155
The paper presents results of using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to assess the development of perennial grasses in conditions of spatiotemporal heterogeneity on the territory of a test monitoring site located in the north-west of the Russian Federation (Leningrad region) on peat soils. The assessment was carried out using ground research and Earth remote sensing data on a test site with an area of 9.5 hectares, divided into 4 elementary sections. The study was carried out in seasons with different agroclimatic conditions using various resources (Vega-Science System and LandViewer). Using a comprehensive analysis of the agroecological assessment of the condition of the landfill territory over 5 years, the main limiting factors were identified. The assessment was carried out using remote sensing and ground soil-agrochemical studies. It has been established that, under conditions of significant heterogeneity in the parameters of soil fertility of peat soils and variability of weather conditions, using only agrochemical methods, it is very difficult to predict the productivity and timing of harvesting perennial grasses. When conducting agroecological monitoring, the feasibility of using the NDVI index to assess the development of perennial grasses in conditions of spatiotemporal heterogeneity on peat soils was determined.
Keywords: Earth remote sensing data, NDVI vegetation index, elevation map, agrolandscape features, agroecological monitoring, agrochemical characteristics, peat soils, productivity, microrelief, hydrothermal coefficient (HTC)
Full text

References:

  1. Verigo S. A., Razumova L. A., Pochvennaya vlaga i ee znachenie v sel’skokhozyaistvennom proizvodstve (Soil moisture and its importance in agricultural production), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1963, 289 p. (in Russian).
  2. Gulinova N. V., Metody agroklimaticheskoi obrabotki nablyudenii (Methods for agroclimatic processing of observations), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974, 174 p. (in Russian).
  3. Dem’yanov V. V., Savel’eva E. A., Geostatistika: teoriya i praktika (Geostatistics: theory and practice), Moscow: Nauka, 2010, 327 p. (in Russian).
  4. Zakharyan Yu. G., Geostatistika: izmenenie klimata i agrotekhnologii (Geostatistics: climate change and agricultural technologies), Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2022, 455 p. (in Russian).
  5. Kirsanov A. D., Komarov A. A., Agroecological monitoring of soil fertility on the example of a test site in the farm of ZAO Osminskoe, slantsevsky district, Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2021, No. 4(65), pp. 69–79 (in Russian), DOI: 10.24412/2078-1318-2021-4-69-79.
  6. Kirsanov A. D., Komarov A. A., Accounting on agro-landscape peculiarities when conducting agroecological monitoring, Agrofizika, 2022, No. 2. pp. 1–6 (in Russian), DOI: 10.25695/AGRPH.2022.02.01.
  7. Kirsanov A. D., Petrushin A. F., Komarov A. A., Estimation of vegetation cover development of perennial grasses based on coupled ground measurements and remote sensing data, Application of Earth remote sensing in agriculture, Saint Petersburg: Agrofizicheskii nauchno-issledovatel’skii institut RASKHN, 2018, pp. 248–257 (in Russian), DOI: 10.25695/agrophysica.2018.2.18806.
  8. Komarov A. A., Sukhanov P. A., On monitoring soil fertility of agricultural lands in the Leningrad region, Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2010, No. 21, pp. 11–17 (in Russian).
  9. Komarov A. A., Zakharyan Yu. G., Irmulatov B. R., Evaluation and analytical approximation of variograms for agricultural fields in the conditions of the Akmolinsky Region of Kazakhstan, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2021, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 182–191 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2021-18-3-182-191.
  10. Loupian E. A., Proshin A. A., Burtsev M. A. et al., Experience of development and operation of the IKI-Monitoring center for collective use of systems for archiving, processing and analyzing satellite data, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2019, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 151–170 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-3-151-170.
  11. Loupian E. A., Proshin A. A., Burtsev M. A. et al., Vega-Science system: design features, main capabilities and usage experience, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2021, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 9–31 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2021-18-6-9-31.
  12. Metodicheskie i organizatsionnye osnovy provedeniya agroekologicheskogo monitoringa v intensivnom zemledelii (na baze Geograficheskoi seti opytov) (Methodological and organizational basis for conducting agroecological monitoring in intensive farming (based on the Geographical Network of Experiments)), Moscow: VIUA im. D. N. Pryanishnikova, 1991, 356 p. (in Russian).
  13. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu lokal’nogo monitoringa na repernykh uchastkakh (Guidelines for conducting local monitoring at reference sites), Moscow, 1996, 15 p. (in Russian).
  14. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu kompleksnogo monitoringa plodorodiya pochv zemel’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya (Methodological guidelines for conducting comprehensive monitoring of soil fertility on agricultural lands), Moscow, 2003, 240 p. (in Russian).
  15. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu registratsionnykh ispytanii agrokhimikatov i regulyatorov rosta rastenii (Guidelines for conducting registration tests of agrochemicals and plant growth regulators), Moscow, 2005 (in Russian).
  16. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu lokal’nogo monitoringa na repernykh i kontrol’nykh uchastkakh (Guidelines for conducting local monitoring at reference and control sites), Moscow: Minsel’khoz, 2006 (in Russian).
  17. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po primeneniyu sul’fata magniya v sel’skokhozyaistvennom proizvodstve (Guidelines for the use of magnesium sulfate in agricultural production), Moscow, 2017, 27 p. (in Russian).
  18. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo “Agroekologicheskaya otsenka zemel’, proektirovanie adaptivno-landshaftnykh sistem zemledeliya i agrotekhnologii” (Methodological guide “Agroecological assessment of land, design of adaptive landscape farming systems and agricultural technologies”), V. I. Kiryushin, A. L. Ivanov (eds.), Moscow: FGNU “Rosinformagrotekh”, 2005, 784 p. (in Russian).
  19. Paramonova E. Yu., Shcherbakova L. F., Naumov P. V., Analysis of water-holding ability of natural and synthetic sorbents, Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2011, Vol. 13, No. 1(5), pp. 1277–1279 (in Russian).
  20. Rusanov A. M., Plants need magnesium, Kartofel’ i ovoshchi, 2004, No. 2, pp. 16–17 (in Russian).
  21. Savin I. Yu., Simakova M. S., Satellite technologies for inventory and monitoring of soils in Russia, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2012, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 104–115 (in Russian).
  22. Sinitsina S. M., Danilova T. N., Tyukalov Yu. A., The state of feed production in the North-West of the Russian Federation and the priorities of scientific support for the industry, Resursosberegayushchie tekhnologii v lugovom kormoproizvodstve, Saint Petersburg, 2013, pp. 224–232. (in Russian).
  23. Sukhanov P. A., Komarov A. A., Kirsanov A. D., Dynamics of changes in agrochemical properties of soils at test sites in the Leningrad region, Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2013, No. 33, pp. 12–19 (in Russian).
  24. Fedotov V. L., Comparative characteristics of magnesium biogeochemistry in the landscapes of the Belarusian Lake District, Uchenye zapiski UO “VGU im. P. M. Masherova”, Estestvennye nauki, Biologiya, 2008, Vol. 7, pp. 269–277 (in Russian).
  25. Cressie N. A.C., Statistics for Spatial Data, New York: Wiley, 1993, 900 p.
  26. Gopp N. V., Savenkov O. A., Relationships between the NDVI, yield of spring wheat, and properties of the plow horizon of eluviated clay-illuvial chernozems and dark gray soils, Eurasian Soil Science, 2019, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 339–347, DOI: 10.1134/S1064229319030050.