ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2023, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 166-175

Dependence assessment between the degree of fire impact on vegetation and the fire radiative power

A.N. Zabrodin 1 , E.I. Ponomarev 1, 2 
1 Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2 Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Accepted: 18.09.2023
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2023-20-5-166-175
The article provides the results of analysis of the characteristics of wildfires in various predominant stands of Siberia (50–75° N, 60–150° E) based on satellite monitoring data from 2015 to 2021. 36 fires were selected for 7 types of different tree stands (vegetation types) with a total area of 19 382 km2. 72 images of the Landsat-8 OLI/TIRS (Operational Land Imager/Thermal Infrared Sensor) satellite were used in the analysis, as well as data from standard products of the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer). Based on the processing of remote data (threshold classification of dNBR (Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio) values), statistical patterns of the ratio of disturbance classes for various types of stands were revealed. It is shown that in the case of fires in light coniferous stands, the ratio of disturbance classes is on average 44, 29 and 27 % for low, medium and high levels of fire impact, respectively. While this proportion is 63, 14 and 23 % in the case of dark coniferous forests, and 59, 26 and 15 % in the case of tundra vegetation, respectively. The conjugate analysis of the radiation power of active fire zones using the Fire Radiative Power (FRP) technique demonstrated an increase in the intensity of fires in terms of integral FRP values, proportional to the increase in the degree of fire impact on vegetation. For a representative sample of fires (in various post-fire polygons in 7 variants of vegetation cover), a significant (R2 = 0.77–0.94, p > 0.05) level of correlation was revealed between the values of the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR/dNBR) and the integral values of the FRP parameter. It has been instrumentally confirmed that high intensity fires (20 000–100 000 MW) are mainly recorded in light coniferous plantations, where the proportion of medium and high degree of fire impact is the greatest (~56 %) as well. The results allow us to consider these indices as complementary when solving the problem of estimating the amount of burning biomass, for example, when calculating the volume of direct fire emissions.
Keywords: vegetation fires, Siberia, NBR/dNBR, FRP, radiation power, disturbance class, post-fire plots, dominant tree stands
Full text

References:

  1. Bartalev S. A., Stycenko F. V., An Assessment of the Forest Stands Destruction by Fires Based on the Remote Sensing Data on a Seasonal Distribution of Burnt Areas, Russian J. Forest Science, 2021, No. 2, pp. 115–122 (in Russian), DOI: 10.31857/S0024114821020029.
  2. Bezkorovainaya I. N., Borisova I. V., Klimchenko A. V., Shabalina O. M., Zakharchenko L. P., Ilyin A. A., Beskrovny A. K., The influence of pyrogenic factor on biological activity of soils under conditions of permafrost (Central Evenkia), Bull. KrasGAU, 2017, No. 9, pp. 181–189 (in Russian).
  3. Kornienko S. G., Transformation of tundra land cover at the sites of pyrogenic disturbance: studies based on Landsat satellite data, Kriosfera Zemli, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 93–104 (in Russian).
  4. Loupian E. A., Lozin D. V., Balashov I. V. et al., Study of the dependence of forest fire damage degree on burning intensity based on satellite monitoring data, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 217–232 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-3-217-232.
  5. Ponomarev E. I., Shvetsov E. G., Usataya Yu. O., Determination of the Energy Properties of Wildfires in Siberia by Remote Sensing, Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2018, Vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 979–985, DOI: 10.1134/S000143381809030X.
  6. Ponomarev E., Shvetsov E., Litvintsev K., Calibration of estimates on direct wildfire emissions based on remote sensing data, Issledovanie Zemli iz kosmosa, 2018, No. 5, pp. 41–51 (in Russian), DOI: 10.31857/S020596140003239-3.
  7. Ponomareva T. V., Ponomarev E. I., Litvintsev K. Yu. et al., Thermal state of disturbed soils in the permafrost zone of Siberia according the remote data and numerical simulation, J. Computational Technologies, 2022, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 16–35 (in Russian), DOI: 10.25743/ICT.2022.27.3.003.
  8. Balashov I., Bartalev S., Burtsev M. et al., Vega-Les Information System. Actual Features and Future Evolution, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, Vol. 507, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/507/1/012002.
  9. Delcourt C. J. F., Combee A., Izbicki B. et al., Evaluating the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio for Assessing Fire Severity Using Sentinel-2 Imagery in Northeast Siberian Larch Forests, Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 13, Issue 12, Article 2311, DOI: 10.3390/rs13122311.
  10. dos Santos S. M. B., Bento-Gonçalves A., Franca-Rocha W., Baptista G., Assessment of Burned Forest Area Severity and Postfire Regrowth in Chapada Diamantina National Park (Bahia, Brazil) Using dNBR and RdNBR Spectral Indices, Geosciences, 2020, Vol. 10, No. 106, DOI: 10.3390/geosciences10030106.
  11. Fan L., Wigneron J. P., Ciais P. et al., Siberian carbon sink reduced by forest disturbances, Nature Geoscience, 2023, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 56–62, DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-01087-x.
  12. Hansen M. C., Potapov P. V., Moore R. et al., High-resolution global maps of 21stcentury forest cover change, Science, 2013, Vol. 342, DOI: 10.1126/science.1244693.
  13. Kharuk V. I., Ponomarev E. I., Ivanova G. A. et al., Wildfires in the Siberian taiga, Ambio, 2021, Vol. 50, Issue 11, pp. 1953–1974, DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01490-x.
  14. Kirdyanov A., Saurer M., Siegwolf R. et al., Long-term ecological consequences of forest fires in the continuous permafrost zone of Siberia, Environmental Research Letters, 2020, Vol. 15, No. 3, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7469.
  15. Knorre A. A., Kirdyanov A. V., Prokushkin A. S. et al., Tree ring-based reconstruction of the long-term influence of wildfires on permafrost active layer dynamics in Central Siberia, Science of the Total Environment, 2019, Vol. 652, pp. 314–319, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.124.
  16. Krylov A., McCarty J. L., Potapov P. et al., Remote sensing estimates of stand-replacement fires in Russia, 2002–2011, Environmental Research Letters, 2014, Vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 1–8, DOI: 10.1088/1748–9326/9/10/105007.
  17. Kumar S. S., Roy D. P., Boschetti L., Kremens R., Exploiting the power law distribution properties of satellite fire radiative power retrievals: A method to estimate fire radiative energy and biomass burned from sparse satellite observations, J. Geophysical Research, 2011, Vol. 116, pp. 1–18, DOI: 10.1029/2011JD015676.
  18. Ponomarev E. I., Yakimov N. D., Ponomareva T. V. et al., Current Trend of Carbon Emissions from Wildfires in Siberia, Atmosphere, 2021, Vol. 12, Issue 5, Article 559, DOI: 10.3390/atmos12050559.
  19. Ponomarev E., Zabrodin A., Ponomareva T., Classification of Fire Damage to Boreal Forests of Siberia in 2021 Based on the dNBR Index, Fire, 2022, Vol. 5, Issue 1, Article 19, DOI: 10.3390/fire5010019.
  20. Ponomarev E., Zabrodin A., Shvetsov E., Ponomareva T., Wildfire Intensity and Fire Emissions in Siberia, Fire, 2023, Vol. 6, Issue 7, Article 246, DOI: 10.3390/fire6070246.
  21. Wooster M. J., Zhukov B., Oertel D., Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning. Derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, Vol. 86, Issue 1, pp. 83–107, DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00070-1.