ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2023, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 144-159

Spatio-temporal analysis of forest cover in the Middle Volga using landscape indices and Landsat satellite data

O.N. Vorobyov 1 , E.A. Kurbanov 1 , S.A. Lezhnin 1 , A.V. Gubayev 1 , D.M. Dergunov 1 , L.V. Tarasova 1 
1 Volga State University of Technology, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia
Accepted: 13.01.2023
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2023-20-1-144-159
The study analyzes the dynamics of forest cover fragmentation in the Middle Volga region of Russian Federation based on the data of 18 multi-temporal Landsat images of 1985, 2001, and 2021 and 11 landscape indices (metrics). For this, two time periods of the spatio-temporal distribution of forest cover between 1985–2001 and 2002–2022 were analyzed using the FRAGSTATS software (version 4.2) and ArcGIS Pro. To obtain detailed maps for 15 land cover (vegetation) classes, Landsat images were consecutively classified using the stepwise unsupervised and supervised classification methods. The main attention was paid to the comparative assessment of landscape indices, which describe the fragmentation of the forest cover structure: forest area, patch and edge density, mean patch size, mean shape index, and proximity index distribution of forest plots. The analysis of landscape indices showed that in 1985–2001, on the territory of Middle Volga there was a trend towards an increase in forest fragmentation. Meanwhile in 2002–2022, the process of aggregation of forest areas takes place, which indicates the opposite trend — a decrease in forest cover fragmentation. The research results allow us to conclude that agricultural activity, urbanization and the development of transport infrastructure remain the driving forces of forest fragmentation in the Middle Volga region. The proposed methodology and algorithm is a useful tool for quantitative assessment of complex ecosystem processes and can be used as an effective means of monitoring the implementation of sustainable forest management indicators.
Keywords: forest fragmentation, landscape indices, Middle Volga region, forest ecosystems, classification, Landsat, spatial analysis, FRAGSTATS
Full text

References:

  1. Kurbanov E.A., Vorob'ev O.N., Distantsionnye metody v lesnom khozyaistve: uchebnoe posobie (Remote sensing in forestry: textbook). Ioshkar-Ola: Volgatech, 2020, 266 p. (in Russian).
  2. Kurbanov E.A., Vorob'ev O.N., Gubaev A.V., Lezhnin S.A., Polevshchikova Y.A., Ac-curacy assessment and agreement between thematic maps of forest cover of different spatial resolution on example of Middle Povolzhje, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kos-mosa, 2016, Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 36–48, DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2016-13-1-36-48 (in Russian).
  3. Kurbanov E.A., Vorob'ev O.N., Gubaev A.V., Lezhnin S.A., Nezamaev S.A., Aleksan-drova T.A., Estimation of reforestation on abandoned agricultural lands in Republic Mari El with the use of satellite images, Vestnik MaRGTU. Ser.: Les. Ehkologiya. Prirodopol'zovanie, 2010, No. 2, pp. 14–20 (In Russian).
  4. Kudryavtsev A.Y. Transformation of forest ecosystems in the forest-steppe zone of the middle Volga region, Ehkosistemy: ehkologiya i dinamika, 2021, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 57–85 (in Russian).
  5. Revutskaya O.L., Fetisov D.M., Spatial distribution of game animals in the Jewish au-tonomous region depending on the forest coverage of the territory, Regional'nye problem, 2015, Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 52–59 (in Russian).
  6. Vorob'ev O.N., Kurbanov E.A., Polevshchikova Y.A., Lezhnin S.A., Assessment of dy-namics and disturbance of forest cover in the Middle Povolzhje by Landsat images, 2016, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 124–134, DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2016-13-3-124-134
  7. Ukrainskii P.A., Terekhin E.A., Pavlyuk Y.V., Fragmentation of forests in the upper part of the Vorskla River basin since the end of the 18th century, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 5, Geografiya, 2017, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 82–91. (in Russian).
  8. Abdullah S.A., Nakagoshi N., Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia, Forest ecology and management, 2007, Vol. 241. Issues 1-3, pp. 39–48, DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.016
  9. Armenteras D., Gonzales T.M., Retana J., Forest fragmentation and edge influence on fire occurrence and intensity under different management types in Amazon forests, Biological conserva-tion, 2013, Vol. 159, pp. 73-79, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.026
  10. Baumann M., Ozdogan M., Kuemmerle T., Wendland KJ., Esipova E., Radeloff V.C., Using the Landsat record to detect forest-cover changes during and after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the temperate zone of European Russia, Remote sensing of environment, 2012, Vol. 124, pp. 174–184, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.001
  11. Castelletta M., Thiollay J., Sodhi N., The effects of extreme forest fragmentation on the bird community of Singapore Island, Biological conservation, 2005, Vol. 121, Issue 1, pp. 135–155, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.033
  12. Castillo E.M., García-Martin A., Aladrén L.A.L., de Luis M., Evaluation of forest cover change using remote sensing techniques and landscape metrics in Moncayo natural park (Spain), Ap-plied geography, 2015, Vol. 62, pp. 247–255, DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.002
  13. Duro D.C., Coops N.C, Wulder M.A., Han T., Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing, Progress in physical geography: Earth and environment, 2007, Vol, 31, Issue 3, pp. 235–260, DOI: 10.1177/0309133307079054
  14. Echeverría C, Coomes D.A., Salas J., Benayas J.M. Rey, Lara A., Newton A.C., Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forests, Biological conservation, 2006, Vol. 130, Issue 4, pp. 481–494, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.017
  15. Echeverria C., Coomes D.A., Hall M., Newton A.C., Spatially explicit models to ana-lyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile, Ecological modelling, 2008, Vol. 212, Issues 3–4, pp. 439–449, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.045
  16. Ewers R.M., Kliskey A.D., Walker S., Rutledge D., Harding J.S., Didham R.K., Past and future trajectories of forest loss in New Zealand, Biological conservation, 2006, Vol. 133, pp. 312–325, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.018
  17. Flowers B., Huang K.T., Aldana G.O., Analysis of the habitat fragmentation of ecosys-tems in Belize using landscape metrics, Sustainability, 2020, Vol. 12, No. 3024, pp. 1–14, doiDOI: 10.3390/su1207302
  18. Fynn I. E. M., Campbell J., Forest fragmentation analysis from multiple imaging for-mats, Journal of landscape ecology, 2019, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1–15, DOI: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0001
  19. Haddad N.M., Brudvig L.A., Clobert J., Davies K.F., Gonzalez A., Holt R.D., Lovejoy T.E., Sexton J.O., Austin M.P., Collins C.D., Cook W.M., et al., Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems, Science Advances, 2015, Vol. 1, Issue 2, Art. No. e1500052, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
  20. Healey S.P., Healey S.P., Cohen W.B., Zhiqiang Y., Krankina O.N., Comparison of tas-seled cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection, Remote sensing of envi-ronment, 2005, Vol. 97, Issue 3, pp. 301–310, DOI: https: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.009
  21. Heilman G.E.; Strittholt J.R.; Slosser N.C.; Dellasala D.A., Forest fragmentation of the conterminous United States: assessing forest intactness through road density and spatial characteristics: forest fragmentation can be measured and monitored in a powerful new way by combining remote sens-ing, geographic information systems, and analytical software, BioScience, 2002, Vol. 52, pp. 411–422.
  22. Hermosilla T., Wulder M.A., White J.C., Coops N.C., Pickell P.D., Bolton D.K., Im-pact of time on interpretations of forest fragmentation: Three-decades of fragmentation dynamics over Canada, Remote sensing of environment, 2019, Vol. 222, pp. 65–77, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.027
  23. Kukkonen M., Kayhko N., Spatio-temporal analysis of forest changes in contrasting land use regimes of Zanzibar, Tanzania, Applied geography, 2014, Vol. 55, pp. 193–202, DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.013
  24. Kurbanov E., Vorobev O., Lezhnin S., Sha J., Wang J., Li X., Cole J., Dergunov D., Wang Y., Remote sensing of forest burnt area, burn severity, and post-fire recovery: a review, Remote Sensing, 2022, Vol. 14, No. 19, Art. No. 4714, DOI: 10.3390/rs14194714
  25. Lai S., El-Adawy A., Sha J., Li X., Wang J., Kurbanov E., Lin Q., Towards an integrat-ed systematic approach for ecological maintenance: Case studies from China and Russia, Ecological Indicators, 2022, Vol. 140, Art No. 108982, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108982
  26. Legarreta-Miranda C.K., Prieto-Amparán J.A., Villarreal-Guerrero F., Morales-Nieto C.R., Pinedo-Alvarez A., Long-term land-use/land-cover change increased the landscape heterogeneity of a fragmented temperate forest in Mexico, Forests, 2021, Vol. 12, Issue 8, Art. No. 1099, pp. 1–14. DOI: 110.3390/f12081099
  27. Leimgruber P., Kelly D., Steininger M., Brunner J., Muller T., Songer M., Forest cover change patterns in Myanmar (Burma) 1990–2000, Environmental conservation, 2005, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 356-364. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892905002493
  28. Li M., Zhu Z., Vogelmann J.E., Xu D., Wen W., Liu A. Characterizing fragmentation of the collective forests in southern China from multitemporal Landsat imagery: A case study from Kecheng district of Zhejiang province, Applied geography, 2011, Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 1026–1035, DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.004
  29. Liu J., Coomes D.A., Gibson L., Hu G., Liu Jn., Luo Y., Wu C., Yu M. Forest fragmen-tation in China and its effect on biodiversity, Biological reviews of the Cambridge philosophical society, 2019, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1636–1657, DOI: 10.1111/brv.12519
  30. McGarigal K., Marks B.J., Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, General technical report, 1995, PNW-GTR-351, Portland, OR: U.S. Department of agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 122 p.
  31. URL: https://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf
  32. Neel M.C., McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area, Landscape ecology, 2004, Vol. 19, pp. 435–455. DOI: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030521.19856.cb
  33. Newton A.C., Hill R.A., Echeverria C., Golicher D., Rey Benayas J.M., Cayuela L., Hinsley S.A. Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology, Progress in physical geography: Earth and Environment, 2009, Vol. 33, Issue 4, pp. 528–546. DOI: 10.1177/0309133309346882
  34. Pyngrope O.R., Kumar M., Pebam R., Singh S.K., Kundu A., Lal D., Investigating for-est fragmentation through earth observation datasets and metric analysis in the tropical rainforest area, SN Applied sciences, 2021, Vol. 3, Art No. 705. pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04683-5
  35. Reddy C.S., Sreelekshmi S., Jha C.S., Dadhwal V.K., National assessment of forest fragmentation in India: Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation and forest cover change, Ecological engineering, 2013, Vol. 60, pp. 453–464, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.064
  36. Remmel T.K., Csillag F., When are two landscape pattern indices significantly differ-ent?, Journal of geographic information system, 2003, Vol. 5, pp. 331–351, DOI: 10.1007/s10109-003-0116-x
  37. Singh J.S., Roy P.S., Murthy M.S.R., Jha C.S., Application of landscape ecology and remote sensing for assessment, monitoring and conservation of biodiversity, Journal of Indian society of remote sensing, 2010, Vol. 38, pp. 365–385, DOI: 10.1007/s12524-010-0033-7
  38. Slattery Z.; Fenner R., Spatial analysis of the drivers, characteristics, and effects of for-est fragmentation, Sustainability, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 6, Art. No. 3246, DOI: 10.3390/su13063246.
  39. Vorobev O.N., Kurbanov E.A., Lezhnin S.A., Dergunov D.M., Tarasova L.V., Monitor-ing and assessment of forest cover disturbance in the Middle Volga region of Russia using Landsat im-ages, IOP “FORECO 2021” Conf., Ser.: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2021, Vol. 932, Art. No. 012007, DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/932/1/012007
  40. Wulder M.A., White J.C., Han T., Coops N.C., Cardille J.A., Holland T., Grills D., Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 2: national forest fragmentation and pattern, Canadian journal of re-mote sensing, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 563–584, DOI: 10.5589/m08-081
  41. Xue X., Hualin X., Yuanhua F., Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of forest change from 1985–2000 in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China, Journal of resources and ecology, 2016, Vol. 7, No 4, pp. 301–308, DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.04.009