ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 248-264

Calibration of significant waves height altimetric measurements by wave reanalysis

S.A. Lebedev 1, 2, 3 , I.V. Gusev 1, 4 
1 Geophysical Center RAS, Moscow, Russia
2 National Research University of Electronic Technology, Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia
3 Maykop State Technological University, Maykop, Russia
4 AO Central Research Institute for Machine Building, Korolev, Moscow Region, Russia
Accepted: 05.12.2022
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-6-248-264
At present, a technology has been developed for calibrating data from altimetry measurements of the sea surface height both at stationary and temporary calibration sites, equipped with modern technology for in situ sea level measurements. It is currently difficult to calibrate significant wave height (SWH) obtained from satellite altimetry data at the sea surface height measurement calibration sites, since most of them are located near the coastline. For this reason, SWH calibration is carried out on fixed wave buoys located in the open ocean. In the Black Sea, where the calibration site for altimetry measurements of the Russian space geodetic system Geo-IK-2 is located, it is difficult to calibrate SWH, since there are no measurements by stationary wave-gauging buoys in its water area, and episodic in situ measurements do not allow high-quality calibration. For this reason, in this paper, we propose a method for calibrating SWH based on wave field reanalysis data. The SWH calculated using the BLKSEA_ MULTIYEAR_WAV_007_006 model was compared with the results of altimetry measurements of 14 satellites for the time interval 1985–2021. The correlation analysis of the results showed a good agreement between the remote sensing data and model calculations, which made it possible to calibrate the altimetry measurements of the Russian Geo-IK-2 satellites No. 12 and No. 13 according to wave reanalysis data. For them, the correlation coefficient was 0.943 and 0.940, respectively, and the determination coefficient was 0.997 and 0.999. Measurements of a sea buoy with a GNSS receiver, which was located on October 19, 2021, near one of the altimetry tracks of the Geo-IK-2 satellite No. 13, showed good agreement between SWH in situ measurements (0.576 m) and altimetry measurements (0.521 m) and model calculations (0.599 m). Thus, it is shown that SWH calculated from altimetry measurements correspond to a measurement accuracy of less than 10 %.
Keywords: satellite altimetry, calibration range, space geodetic system, significant wave height, wave reanalysis
Full text

References:

  1. Gryazin D. G., Berdyugin A. V., Wallpower buoys among modern wave equipment, Scientific and Technical J. Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2006, No. 31, pp. 233–240 (in Russian).
  2. Davidan I. N., Lopatukhin L. I., Rozhkov V. A., Veter i volny v okeanakh i moryakh (Wind and waves in the oceans and seas), Leningrad: Transport, 1974, 359 p. (in Russian).
  3. Zelenko A. A., Strukov B. S., Resnyanskii Yu. D., Martynov S. L., The forecast system of wind waves in the oceans and seas of Russia, Proc. State Oceanographic Institute, 2014, Vol. 215, pp. 90–101 (in Russian).
  4. Lebedev S. A., Gusev I. V., International experience in calibration of satellite altimetry data on the stationary and temporary calibration sites, Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2021, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 18–35 (in Russian), DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2021-18-2-18-35.
  5. Myslenkov S. A., Chernyshova E. V., The forecast of wind excitement in the Black Sea using the prognostic winds of the wind of various spatial resolution, Proc. Hydrometeorological Research Center of the Russian Federation, 2016, No. 362, pp. 55–65 (in Russian).
  6. Myslenkov S. A., Chernyshova E. V., Arkhipkin V. S., The system of prediction of wind excitement in the Black Sea with details in the shelf zones, Results of Testing New and Improved Technologies, Models and Methods of Hydrometeorological Forecasts, 2017, No. 44, pp. 126–135 (in Russian).
  7. Ratner Yu. B., Fomin V. V., Ivanchik A. M., Ivanchik M. V., System of the wind wave operational forecast by the Black Sea Marine Forecast Center, Physical Oceanography, 2017, No. 5, pp. 51–59, DOI: 10.22449/1573-160X-2017-5-51-59.
  8. Akpinar A., van Vledder G. P., Kömürcü M. İ., Özger M., Evaluation of the numerical wave model (SWAN) for wave simulation in the Black Sea, Continental Shelf Research, 2012, Vol. 50–51, pp. 80–99, DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.09.012.
  9. Arkhipkin V. S., Gippius F. N., Koltermann K. P., Surkova G. V., Wind waves in the Black Sea: results of a hindcast study, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2014, Vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 2883–2897, DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-2883-2014.
  10. Caires S., Sterl A., Validation of ocean wind and wave data using triple collocation, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003, Vol. 108, No. C3, Art. No. 3098, DOI: 10.1029/2002JC001491.
  11. Carter D. J. T., Challenor P. G., Srokosz M. A., An assessment of Geosat wave height and wind speed measurements, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1992, Vol. 97, No. C7, pp. 11383–11392, DOI: 10.1029/92JC00465.
  12. Cherneva Z., Andreeva N., Pilar P., Valchev N., Petrova P., Soares C. G., Validation of the WAMC4 wave model for the Black Sea, Coastal Engineering, 2008, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 881–893, DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.02.028.
  13. Ciliberti S. A., Grégoire M., Staneva J., Palazov A., Coppini G., Lecci R., Peneva E., Matreata M., Marinova V., Masina S., Pinardi N., Jansen E., Lima L., Aydoğdu A., Creti’ S., Stefanizzi L., Azevedo D., Causio S., Vandenbulcke L., Capet A., Meulders C., Ivanov E., Behrens A., Ricker M., Gayer G., Palermo F., Ilicak M., Gunduz M., Valcheva N., Agostini P., Monitoring and Forecasting the Ocean State and Biogeochemical Processes in the Black Sea: Recent Developments in the Copernicus Marine Service, J. Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, Vol. 9, No. 10, Art. No. 1146, DOI: 10.3390/jmse9101146.
  14. Cotton P. D., Carter D. J. T., Cross calibration of TOPEX, ERS‐I, and GEOSAT wave heights, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1994, Vol. 99, No. C12, pp. 25025–25033, DOI: 10.1029/94JC02131.
  15. Divinsky B. V., Kosyan R. D., Spatiotemporal variability of the Black Sea wave climate in the last 37 years, Continental Shelf Research, 2017, Vol. 136, pp. 1–19, DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2017.01.008.
  16. Dobson E., Monaldo F., Goldhirsh J., Wilkerson J., Validation of Geosat altimeter‐derived wind speeds and significant wave heights using buoy data, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1987, Vol. 92, No. C10, pp. 10719–10731, DOI: 10.1029/JC092iC10p10719.
  17. Ebuchi N., Kawamura H., Validation of wind speeds and significant wave heights observed by the TOPEX altimeter around Japan, J. Oceanography, 1994, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 479–487, DOI: 10.1007/BF02234969.
  18. Fedor L. S., Brown G. S., Waveheight and wind speed measurements from the SEASAT radar altimeter, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1982, Vol. 87, No. C5, pp. 3254–3260, DOI: 10.1029/JC087iC05p03254.
  19. Gower J. F. R., Intercalibration of wave and wind data from TOPEX/Poseidon and moored buoys off the west coast of Canada, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1996, Vol. 101, No. C2, pp. 3817–3829, DOI: 10.1029/95jc03281.
  20. Guillaume A., Statistical tests for the comparison of surface gravity wave spectra with application to model validation, J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1990, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 551–567, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0551:STFTCO>2.0.CO;2.
  21. Janssen P. A. E. M., Abdalla S., Hersbach H., Bidlot J. R., Error estimation of buoy, satellite, and model wave height data, J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2007, Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 1665–1677, DOI: 10.1175/JTECH2069.1.
  22. Kortcheva A., Kortchev G., Lefevre J. M., Operational numerical wind-wave model for the Black Sea, Mediterranean Marine Science, 2000, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 65–70, DOI: 10.12681/mms.11.
  23. Myslenkov S., Chernyshova A., Comparing wave heights simulated in the Black Sea by the SWAN model with satellite data and direct wave measurements, Russian J. Earth Sciences, 2016, Vol. 16, No. 5, Art. No. ES5002. 12 p., DOI: 10.2205/2016ES000579.
  24. Queffeulou P., Long-term validation of wave height measurements from altimeters, Marine Geodesy, 2004, Vol. 27, No. 3–4, pp. 495–510, DOI: 10.1080/01490410490883478.
  25. Ray R. D., Beckley B. D., Simultaneous ocean wave measurements by the Jason and TOPEX satellites, with buoy and model comparisons, Marine Geodesy, 2003, Vol. 26, No. 3–4, pp. 367–382, DOI: 10.1080/714044527.
  26. Ribal A., Young I. R., 33 years of globally calibrated wave height and wind speed data based on altimeter observations, Scientific Data, 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–15, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0083-9.
  27. Rusu L., Bernardino M., Guedes Soares C., Wind and wave modelling in the Black Sea, J. Operational Oceanography, 2014, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5–20, DOI: 10.1080/1755876X.2014.11020149.
  28. Sepulveda H. H., Queffeulou P., Ardhuin F., Assessment of SARAL/AltiKa wave height measurements relative to buoy, Jason-2, and Cryosat-2 data, Marine Geodesy, 2015, Vol. 38, No. sup1, pp. 449–465, DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2014.1000470.
  29. Shaeb K. H. B., Anand A., Joshi A. K., Bhandari S. M., Comparison of near coastal significant wave height measurements from SARAL/AltiKa with wave rider buoys in the Indian region, Marine Geodesy, 2015, Vol. 38, No. sup1, pp. 422–436, DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2015.1029655.
  30. SWAN scientific and technical documentation, SWAN Cycle III Version 41.31 AB, Delft: Delft Univ. Technology, 2010, 144 p.
  31. The WAMDI Group, The WAM model A third generation ocean wave prediction model, J. Physical Oceanography, 1988, Vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 1775–1810, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<1775:TWMTGO>2.0.CO;2.
  32. The WAVEWATCH III® Development Group (WW3DG), User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III® version 5.16, Tech. Note 329, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB, College Park, MD, USA, 2016, 361 p., available at: https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/wavewatch/manual.v5.16.pdf.
  33. Yang J., Zhang J., Validation of Sentinel-3A/3B satellite altimetry wave heights with buoy and Jason-3 data, Sensors, 2019, Vol. 19, No. 13, Art. No. 2914, DOI: 10.3390/s19132914.
  34. Ye X., Lin M., Xu Y., Validation of Chinese HY-2 satellite radar altimeter significant wave height, Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2015, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 60–67, DOI: 10.1007/s13131-015-0667-y.
  35. Young I. R., An intercomparison of GEOSAT, TOPEX and ERS1 measurements of wind speed and wave height, Ocean Engineering, 1998, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 67–81, DOI: 10.1016/S0029-8018(97)10016-6.
  36. Zieger S., Vinoth J., Young I. R., Joint calibration of multiplatform altimeter measurements of wind speed and wave height over the past 20 years, J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009, Vol. 26, No. 12, pp. 2549–2564, DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1303.1.