ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2022, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 212-222

On the estimation of surface current velocities from microwave sea surface measurements at moderate incidence angles

I.A. Sergievskaya 1, 2, 3 , S.A. Ermakov 1, 2, 3 , L.M. Plotnikov 1, 3 , I.A. Kapustin 1, 4, 3 , A.V. Ermoshkin 1, 3 
1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
2 Volga State University of Water Transport, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
3 Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
4 Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russia
Accepted: 27.04.2022
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2022-19-2-212-222
Estimation of surface current velocities and their structure from microwave radar data is one of the important problems of remote sensing of the sea surface. The paper presents some results of measurements of surface current velocities from the Doppler spectra obtained by polarization multifrequency radar (X-/C-/S-bands) at moderate incident angles (40–70 degrees) of radiation in the upwind direction. A comparison of measured velocities with independent measurements of surface currents using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) is also presented. The radar scatterer velocities were determined from the Doppler spectrum centroid (Doppler shift) of the backscattered signal at VV and HH polarizations, and then for the Bragg (polarized) and non-Bragg (nonpolarized) components. It is shown that the flow velocity retrieved from the Doppler shift of the Bragg component after subtraction of the Bragg wave intrinsic velocity agrees well with the independent measurements. For the nonpolarized component, the scatterers velocities are close to the sum of surface current velocity and decimeter wave velocity with lengths of 10–70 cm, a sharp change in the scatterer velocity is observed for wind speeds of the order of 5–7 m/s. The latter is due to the contribution to the backscattering of the nonpolarised component associated with small-scale breaking moving at the short decimeter wave velocities (20–30 cm) and individual strong wave breaking (foam crests) moving at the meter wave velocities. At wind speeds at which strong wave breaking appears at the surface, the weighted speed of the scatterers increases sharply due to the appearance of fast scatterers.
Keywords: three-frequency microwave polarization Doppler radar, Bragg (polarized) and non-Bragg (non-polarized) scatterers, surface current
Full text

References:

  1. Bass F. G., Fuchs I. M., Rasseyanie voln na statisticheski nerovnoi poverkhnosti (Scattering of waves by statistically rough surfaces), Moscow: Nauka, 1972, 424 p. (in Russian).
  2. Ermakov S. A., Sergievskaya I. A., Zuikova E. M., Shchegolkov Yu. B., Modulation of radar backscatter by long waves on the sea surface covered with a substances film, Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2004, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 91–98.
  3. Ermoshkin A. V., Kapustin I. A., Molkov A. A., Bogatov N. A., Determination of the Sea Surface Current by a Doppler X-Band Radar, Fundamental’naya i prikladnaya gidrofizika, 2020, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 93–103 (in Russian), DOI: 10.7868/S2073667320030089.
  4. Chapron F., Collard F., Ardhuin F., Direct measurements of ocean surface velocity from space: Interpretation and validation, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2005, Vol. 110, No. C7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002809.
  5. Ermakov S. A., Sergievskaya I. A., Dobrokhotov V. A., Lazareva T. N., Wave Tank Study of Steep Gravity-Capillary Waves and Their Role in Ka-Band Radar Backscatter, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, Vol. 60, Art. No. 3086627, 12 p., DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3086627.
  6. Fois F., Hoogeboom P., Le Chevalier F., Stoffelen A., An analytical model for the description of the full polarimetric sea surface Doppler signature, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2015, Vol. 120, pp. 988–1015, DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010589.
  7. Hara T., Plant W., Hydrodynamic modulation of short wind-wave spectra by long waves and its measurement using microwave backscatter, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1994, Vol. 99, No. C5, pp. 9767–9784, DOI: 10.1029/93JC03514.
  8. Kapustin I. A., Shomina O. V., Ermoshkin A. V., Bogatov N. A., Kupaev A. V., Molkov A. A., Ermakov S. A., On Capabilities of Tracking Marine Surface Currents Using Artificial Film Slicks, Remote Sensing, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 7, Art. No. 840, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070840.
  9. Kudryavtsev V., Hauser D., Caudal G., Chapron B., A semi-empirical model of the normalized radar cross section of the sea surface 1. Background model, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003, Vol. 108, No. C3, Art. No. 8054, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001003.
  10. Martin A. C. H., Gommenginger C., Marquez J., Doody S., Navarro V., Buck C., Wind-wave-induced velocity in ATI SAR ocean surface currents: First experimental evidence from an airborne campaign, J. Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2016, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 1640–1653, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011459.
  11. Martin A. C. H., Gommenginger C. P., Jacob B., Staneva J., First multi-year assessment of Sentinel-1 radial velocity products using HF radar currents in a coastal environment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2022, Vol. 268, Art. No. 112758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112758.
  12. Moiseev A., Johnsen H., Johannessen J. A., Retrieving Ocean Surface Currents from the Sentinel-1 Doppler Shift Observations: A Case Study of the Norwegian Coastal Current, Proc. IEEE Intern. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS’2020), 2020, pp. 5670–5673, DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323496.
  13. Mouche A., Collard F., Chapron B., Dagestad K., Guitton G., Johannessen J., Kerbaol V., Hansen M., On the Use of Doppler Shift for Sea Surface Wind Retrieval From SAR, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 2901–2909, DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2174998.
  14. Nouguier F., Chapron B., Collard F., Mouche A., Rascle N., Ardhuin F., Wu X., Sea Surface Kinematics from Near-Nadir Radar Measurement, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, Vol. 56, No. 10, pp. 6169–6179, DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2833200.
  15. Phillips O. M., Radar returns from the sea surface — Bragg scattering and breaking waves, J. Physical Oceanography, 1988, Vol. 18, pp. 1065–1074.
  16. Sergievskaya I., Ermakov S., Ermoshkin A., Kapustin I., Molkov A., Danilicheva O., Shomina O., Modulation of Dual-Polarized X-Band Radar Backscatter Due to Long Wind Waves, Remote Sensing, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 4, Art. No. 423, DOI:10.3390/rs11040423.
  17. Sergievskaya I., Ermakov S., Ermoshkin A., Kapustin I., Shomina O., Kupaev A., The Role of Micro Breaking of Small-Scale Wind Waves in Radar Backscattering from Sea Surface, Remote Sensing, 2020, Vol. 12, No. 24, Art. No. 4159, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244159.
  18. Valenzuela G. R., Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves — A review, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1978, Vol. 13, No. 1–4, pp. 61–85, DOI: 10.1007/BF00913863.
  19. Voronovich A. G., Zavorotny V. U., A Numerical Model of Radar Scattering from Steep and Breaking Waves, Proc. IEEE Intern. Symp. Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IGARSS’06), Denver, 2006, pp. 469–472, DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2006.125.