Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2018, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 84-99

Experience of long-term monitoring of phytocenosis condition using temporary irregular remote sensing data in zones of increased radiation hazard

K. Yu. Silkin 1 , A.N. Kizeyev 2 
1 Voronezh State University, Voronezh , Russia
2 N. A. Avrorin Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute of Kola Science Centre RAS, Apatity, Russia
Accepted: 19.02.2018
DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-2-84-99
The technique of condition assessment of phytocenosis on the basis of irregular long-term data of remote sensing of Earth is developed and approved. Remote studying of boreal landscapes faces a persistent problem of exclusive rarity of absolutely cloudless days. During continuous annual study of medium-sized, but numerous objects located in a certain area, it often occurs that not all the objects are visi­ble at the same time among clouds during the next overflight of the satellite. Although such satellite as Landsat overfly every location on the globe approximately twice a month, the observations of each object are rather irregular. That is why very scarce data obtained at different times of the vegetation period are available for a long-term monitoring. Such observations are very difficult for direct comparison. The proposed technique was developed for the solution of this problem. Its essence is assessing the key parameters at the peak of a vegetative season use the scarce and irregular values obtained. In this work, the NDVI index was chosen key parameter, however, the offered technique can be applied also to other similar indexes. The test of this technique was for the first time performed by an example of the stationary monitoring sites system represented by bilberry pine forests. This system was developed within a 30-km zone around the Kola nuclear power plant which is a potentially dangerous object of nuclear power on the territory of the European Arctic. The received results allowed to draw conclusions on spatial and temporary influence of the nuclear power station on the condition of the environment.
Keywords: Kola nuclear power plant, phytocenosis, remote sensing, NDVI index, monitoring, algorithm
Full text

References:

  1. Avrorin N. A., Kachurin M. Kh., Korovkin A. A., Materialy po rastitelnosti Khibinskikh gor (Materials on vegetation of Khibiny Mountains), Materialy po rastitelnosti tsentralnoy i zapadnoy chastey Kolskogo poluostrova. Trudy soveta po izucheniyu proizvoditelnykh sil. Seriya Kolskaya (Materials on vegetation of the central and western Kola Peninsula. Advances of the Council on the study of productive forces. Ser. Kolskaya), Issue 11, Moscow: Izd. AN SSSR, 1936, pp. 19–90.
  2. Alisov B. P., Berlin I. A., Mikhel V. M., Kurs klimatologii. Ch. III (Climatology study. Vol. III), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1954, 320 p.
  3. Doklad o sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy Murmanskoy oblasti v 2014 godu (The report on state and environmental protection of Murmansk region in 2014), Murmansk, 2015, 177 p.
  4. Kizeyev A. N., Karnachev I. P., Zhirov V. K., Zagvozdina O. I., Nikanov A. N., Voprosy ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti na predpriyatiyakh promyshlennogo kompleksa Kolskogo Zapolyaria (Questions of ecological safety at the enterprises of industrial branch of the Kola Polar region), Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya, 2010, No. 4, pp. 28–31.
  5. Neshatayev V. Yu., Neshatayeva V. Yu., Sintaksonomicheskoye raznoobraziye sosnovykh lesov Lapland­skogo zapovednika (Sintaxonomical variety of the pine forests of Lapland Biosphere Reserve), Botanicheskiy zhurnal, 2002, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 99–106.
  6. Minprirody of Russia: Order No. 613, Date 24.12.2013, 18 p.
  7. Puzachenko M. Yu., Chernenkova T. V., Opredeleniye faktorov prostranstvennogo varirovaniya rastitelnogo pokrova s ispolzovaniyem DDZ, TsMR i polevykh dannykh na primere tsentralnoy chasti Murmanskoy oblasti (Definition of a vegetable cover factors of a spatial variation with use of remote sensing, relief digital model and field data on the example of the central part of Murmansk region), Sovremennyye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2016, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 167–191.
  8. Sambuk F. V., Pechorskiye lesa (Pechora forests), Trudy botanicheskogo muzeya AN SSSR (Advances of Botanical Museum AN SSSR), 1932, Vol. 24, pp. 63–250.
  9. Spravochnik po klimatu SSSR. Vyp. 2, Murmanskaya oblast’. Ch. II. Temperatura vozdukha i ­pochvy (Reference book on climate of the USSR. Issue 2, Murmansk region, Vol. II. Temperature of air and ground), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1965, 144 p.
  10. Shovengerdt R. A., Distantsionnoye zondirovaniye. Modeli i metody obrabotki izobrazheniy (Remote sensing. Models and methods of images processing), Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 2013, 592 p.
  11. Yakovlev B. A., Klimat Murmanskoy oblasti (Climate of Murmansk region), Murmansk: Murmanskoye knizhnoye izdatelstvo, 1961, 200 p.
  12. Bhandari S. P., Monitoring forest dynamics using time series of satellite image data in Queensland, Australia, PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Australia, 2011, 155 p.
  13. Eklundh L., Jönsson P., TIMESAT 3.3 with seasonal trend decomposition and parallel processing, Software Manual, Lund, Malmö, 2017, 92 p.
  14. Greenberg J. S., Hertzfeld H., Space economics, Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, Vol. 144, Washington, DC: American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1992, 437 p.
  15. Jeganathan C., Dash J., Atkinson P. M., Remotely sensed trends in the phenology of northern high latitude terrestrial vegetation, controlling for land cover change and vegetation type, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, Vol. 143, No. 3, pp. 154–170.
  16. Jeong S.-J., Schimel D., Frankenberg C., Drewry D. T., Fisher J. B., Verma M., Berry J. A., Lee J.-E., Joiner J., Application of satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to understanding large-scale variations in vegetation phenology and function over northern high latitude forests, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, Vol. 190, No. 3, pp. 178–187.
  17. Jia G. J., Epstein H. E., Walker D. A., Greening of arctic Alaska, 1981–2001, Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, Vol. 30, Issue 20, pp. 3-1–3-4.
  18. Myneni R. B., Keeling C. D., Tucker C. J., Asrar G., Nemanill R. R., Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991, Nature, 1997, Vol. 386, No. 4, pp. 698–702.
  19. Olthof I., Pouliot D., Latifovic R., Chen W., Vegetation-Specific NDVI Trends in Northern Canada from Satellite Data, Arctic, 2008, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 381–394.
  20. Parent M. B., Verbyla D., The Browning of Alaska’s Boreal Forest, Remote Sensing, 2010, No. 2(12), pp. 2729–2747.
  21. Reed B. C., Brown J. F., VanderZee D., Loveland Th. R., Merchant J. W., Ohlen D. O., Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery, J. Vegetation Science, 1994, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 703–714.