Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2013, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 114-121

The analysis of generalized scale invariability for the electric field turbulence in thunderstorm clouds

I.A. Krasnova 1, N.S. Erokhin 2, N.N. Zolnikova 3, L.A. Mikhailovskaya 3
1 Peoples’ Friendship University, Moscow, Russia
2 Peoples’ Friendship University; Space Research Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia
3 Space Research Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia
As it is known the wind fluxes in intensive atmospheric vortices like tropical cyclones (TC) have the hydrodynamical helicity which increases their stability and the life time. Moreover tropical cyclones have charged subsystems (ECS) creating the large electric fields of the order of 100 kV/m which facilitate development of hurricanes and whirlwinds. So for the correct description of charged subsystems role in the generation of helical wind flows and their following dynamics inside the powerful atmospheric vortices it is necessary to analyze the structural characteristics of electric turbulence in thunderstorm clouds. Below on the basis of structure functions Sm (L) analysis it is described the results of investigation of generalized scale invariability possibility for electric turbulence by usage of experimental data on the electric field vertical profile in thunderstorm clouds for the heights z < 13 km. It has been considered the electric turbulence inertial intervals, scaling exponents, the magnitude of both Herst index and curtosis for these intervals. For inertial intervals it was revealed the Sm (L) deviations from power law scalings. It has been shown that for the small scales and middle ones the electric turbulence is closed enough to the generalized scale invariability law. The deviations from this law observed may be explained by the presence of both the turbulence intermittency and coherent electric structures. Results obtained may be used for the following estimates of electric subsystems role in the generation of selfconsistent, essentially inhomogeneous structure of wind fluxes in TC, for the numerical modeling of their nonlinear dynamics with usage of the parametrization schemes, taking into account the ECS, and to study the possibility of influence on TC dynamics. Besides these results are of great interest for the following development of methods for processing of remote sensing data on atmospheric vortices, more detailed and correct physical interpretation such data processing results.
Keywords: структурные функции, инерционные интервалы, электрическая турбулентность, скейлинговые экспоненты, грозовая облачность, обобщенная масштабная инвариантность, высотные распределения, structure functions, inertial intervals, electric turbulence, scaling exponents, thunderstorm clouds, generalized scale invariability, altitude distribution
Full text

References:

  1. Artekha S.N., Gol'braikh E., Erokhin N.P., Voprosy atomnoi nauki i tekhniki, 2003, No. 4, pp. 94–99.
  2. Artekha S.N., Erokhin N.P., Elektromagnitnye yavleniya, 2005, Vol. 5, No. 1(14), pp. 3–11.
  3. Bondur V.G., Pulinets S.A., Issledovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2012, No. 3, pp. 3–11.
  4. Erokhin N.S., Moiseev S.P., Problemy geofiziki XXI veka, 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 160–182.
  5. Kozak L.V., Pilipenko V.A., Chugunova O.M., Kozak P.N., Kosmicheskie issledovaniya, 2011, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 202–212.
  6. Lidvanskii A.S., Khaerdinov N.P., Izvestiya RAN. Seriya fizicheskaya, 2011, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 888–890.
  7. Moiseev S.S., Chkhetiani O.G., Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 1996, Vol. 110, Issue 1(7), pp. 357–370.
  8. Frik P.G., Turbulentnost': podkhody i modeli, (Turbulence: approaches and models), Izhevsk: NITs “Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika”, 2010, 332 p.
  9. Branover H, Eidelman A., Golbraikh E. and Moiseev P., Turbulence and Structures. Chaos, Fluctuations and Self-organization in Nature and in the Laboratory, San-Diego: Academic Press, 1998, 270 р.
  10. Byrne G.J., Few A.A. and Stewart M.F., Electric field measurements within a severe thunderstorm anvil, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, Vol. 94 (D5), pp. 6297–6307.
  11. Dubrulle B., Intermittency in fully developed turbulence: log-Poisson statistics and generalized scale covariance, Physical Review Letters, 1994, Vol. 73, pp. 959–967.
  12. Horbury T.S., Balogh A., Structure function measurements of the intermittent MHD turbulent cascade, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 1997, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 185–199.
  13. Khaerdinov N.S., Lidvansky A.S., Petkov V.B., Electric field of thunderclouds and cosmic rays: evidence for acceleration of particles (runaway electrons), Atmospheric Research, 2005, Vol. 76, Iss.1–4, pp. 346–354.
  14. Lazarev A.A., Moiseev S.P., Geophysical Precursors of Early Stages of Cyclogenesis, Space Research InstituteRAS (Preprint), 1990, 13 p.
  15. Litvinenko L.N., Ryabov V.B., Usik P.V., Vavriv D.M., Correlation Dimension: The New Tool in Astrophysics, Institute of Radio Astronomy, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Preprint), No. 64, 1992, 53 p.
  16. Marsh E., Tu C.Y., Intermittency, non-Gaussian statistics and fractal scaling of MHD fluctuations, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 1997, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 101–124.
  17. Marshak A., Davies A., Wiscombe W., Cahalan R., Scale-invariance of liquid water distribution in marine stratocumulus. Part II. Multifractal properties and intermittency issues, Journal of Atmospherical Sciences, 1997, Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 1423–1444.
  18. Marshall T.C. and Rust W.D., Electrical structures and updrafts speeds in thunderstorms over the southern great-plains, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995, Vol. 100 (D1), pp. 1001–1015.
  19. Osborne A.R., Provenzale A., Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with powerlaw spectra, Physica Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1989, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 357–381.
  20. Schertzer D., Lovejoy S., Schmitt F., Chigirinskaya Y., Marsan D., Multifractal cascade dynamics and turbulent intermittency, Fractals, 1997, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 427–471.
  21. She Z., E. Leveque E., Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence, Physical Review Letters, 1994, Vol. 72, pp. 336–339.
  22. Sura P. and Perron M., Extreme events and the general circulation: observations and stochastic model dynamics, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2010, Vol. 67, No. 9, pp. 2785–2804.
  23. Zadorozhny A.M., A.A. Tyutin A.A., Effects of geomagnetic activity on the mesospheric electric fields, Annales Geophysicae, 1998, Vol. 16, pp. 1544–1551.