Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2012, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 241-250

Problems of detection of coccolithophore blooms from satellite data

O.V. Kopelevich , V.I. Burenkov , S.V. Vazyulya , S.V. Sheberstov 
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology Russian Academy of Sciences (IO RAS) Russian State Hydrometeorological University, 117997, Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospect, 36 195196, St-Petersburg, Malookhtinsky prospect, 98
A feasibility of quantitative assessment of the intensity of coccolithophore blooms (CB) in the Barents and Black seas from satellite data is studied. The main problem in the Black Sea is influence of river runoff, there is not a such effect on CB in the Barents Sea. The possibility to use the published data on the backscattering coefficients of coccolithophore and coccolith (Voss et al., 1998) is shown, and the algorithm based on these data has been proposed for the Barents Sea
Keywords: satellite color scanner, coccolithophore blooms, Barents and Black seas, modeling, algorithms
Full text

References:

  1. Burenkov V.I., Ershova S.V., Kopelevich O.V., Okeanologiya, 2001, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 653–659.
  2. Burenkov V.I., Kopelevich O.V, Rat'kova T.N., Sheberstov S.V., Okeanologiya, 2011, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1–9.
  3. Burenkov V.I., Kopelevich O.V, Sheberstov S.V., Vazyulya S.V., Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2011, Issue 8, Vol. 4, pp. 190–199.
  4. Karabashev G.S., Okeanologiya, 2011, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 42–44.
  5. Kopelevich O.V., Lyutsarev S.V., Rodionov V.V., Okeanologiya, 1989, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 409–414.
  6. Kopelevich O.V., Sheberstov S.V., Burenkov V.I., Fundamental'nye issledovaniya okeanov i morei, 2006, Vol. 1, pp. 109–126.
  7. Burenkov V.I., Kopelevich O.V., Sheberstov S.V., Prokhorenko O.V., Klyuvitkin A.A., Pautova L.V., The June maxima of the particle backscatter in the Black Sea: results of three years satellite and field studies, Proc. 4th Intern. Conf. “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters (ONW’2007)”, Nizhny Novgorod, 2007, pp. 157–160.
  8. Cokacar T., Kubilay N., Oguz T., Structure of E. huxleyi blooms in the Black Sea surface waters as detected by SeaWiFS imagery, Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, Vol. 28, pp. 4607–4610.
  9. Gordon H., Boynton G., Balch W., Groom S.B., Harbour D.S., Smyth T.J., Retrieval of coccolithophore calcite concentration from SeaWiFS imagery, Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1587–1590.
  10. Gordon H.R., Brown O.B., Evans R.H., Brown J.W., Smith R.C., Baker K.S., Clark D.K., A semianalytic radiance model of ocean color, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1988, Vol. 93, pp. 10909–10924.
  11. Gordon H.R.., Balch W.M., MODIS Detached Coccolith Concentration, Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. NASA, 1999.
  12. Kopelevich O.V., Burenkov V.I., Sheberstov S.V., Case Studies of Optical Remote Sensing in the Barents Sea, Black Sea, and Caspian Sea (from Remote Sensing of the European Seas), Springer, 2008, pp. 53–66.
  13. Kopelevich O.V., Burenkov V.I., Sheberstov S.V., Vazyulya S.V., Satellite observations of coccolithophore blooms in the Barents and Black Seas, Proc. 6th Intern. Conf. “Current problems in Optics of Natural Waters (ONW′20011)”, Saint-Petersburg, 2011, pp. 177–180.
  14. Lee Z., Carder K.L., Mobley C.D., Steward R.G., Patch J.S., Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters, Applied Optics, 1998, Vol. 37, No. 27, pp. 6329–6338.
  15. Morel A., Gentili B., Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters, Applied Optics, 1993, Vol. 32, pp. 6864–6879.
  16. Pope R.M., Fry E.S., Absorption spectrum (380…700 nm) of pure water, Applied Optics, 1997, Vol. 36, No. 33, pp. 8710–8723.
  17. Sheberstov S., Nabiullina M., Lukyanova E., Numerical modeling of radiative transfer in ocean-atmosphere system with wind-roughened surface, Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. “Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters”, Saint-Petersburg, 2003, pp. 90–95.
  18. Smyth T. J., Tyrrell T., Tarrant B., Time series of coccolithophore activity in the Barents Sea, from twenty years of satellite imagery, Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, Vol. 31, L11302. doi: 10.1029/2004GL019735.
  19. Voss K.J., Balch W.M., Kilpatrick K.A., Scattering and attenuation properties of Emiliania huxleyi cells and their detached coccoliths, Limnology and Oceanography, 1998, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 870–876.