Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2012, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 181-189

Ionospheric Response to the 15 December 2006 Magnetic Storm at Middle Latitudes

N.M. Polekh1, E.B. Romanova1, N.A. Zolotukhina1, A.A. Shcherbakov1, Z.F. Dumbrava2, M.K. Ivelskaya3
1 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov, 126a
2 Institute of Cosmophysical Researches and Radio Wave Propagation, 684034, Kamchatka region,Elizovskiy district, Paratunka, Mirnaya str., 7
3 Research Institute of Applied Physics " Irkutsk State University ", 664033, Irkutsk, b.Gagarina, 20
Based on data obtained by ionospheric midlatitude ionosondes and incoherent scatter radar (Irkutsk), we have studied the ionospheric response to the 15 December 2006 magnetic storm. During the main storm phase, ionospheric stations registered several positive disturbances during which critical frequencies (foF2) were higher by 1-4 MHz of a quiet level. The increase in the critical frequencies was accompanied by significant variations in a peak height of the F2 layer. The analysis of the temporal variations in foF2 and hmF2 led to the conclusion on the impact of large-scale wave processes on the ionization distribution at the F2 region heights. The increase in electron and ion temperatures of 200 - 300 ºK to relatively quiet conditions was registered by the HP radar at Irkutsk. Modeling the distribution of ionospheric characteristics showed that the best agreement between the experimental and calculated parameters of the ionosphere can be reached by adjusting the model of the neutral atmosphere and the rate of vertical drift
Keywords: magnetic storm, ionospheric disturbance, critical frequency, electron temperature, ionospheric plasma simulation
Full text

References:

  1. Afraimovich E.L., Gavrilyuk N.S., Dem'yanov V.V., Smol'kov G.Ya., Ishin A.B., Kosmicheskie issledovaniya, 2009, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 146–157.
  2. Zolotukhina N.A., Pirog O.M., Polekh N.M., Geomagnetizm i aeronomiya, 2011, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 579–591.
  3. Drob D.P., Emmert J.T., Crowley G., Picone J.M., Shepherd G.G., Skinner W., Hayes P., Niciejewski R.J., Larsen M., She C.Y., Meriwether J.W., Hernandez G., Jarvis M.J., Sipler D.P., Tepley C.A., O’Brien M.S., Bowman J.R., Wu Q., Murayama Y., Kawamura S., Reid I.M., Vincent R.A., An Empirical Model of the Earth’s Horizontal Wind Fields: HWM07, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008. doi:10.1029/2008JA013668.
  4. Hardy D.A., Gussenhoven M.S., Raistrick R., Statistical and functional representation of the pattern of auroral energy flux, number flux, and conductivity, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1987, Vol. 92, pp. 12-275–12-2294.
  5. Hayashi H., Nishitani N., Ogawa T., Otsuka Y., Tsugawa T., Hosokawa K., Saito A., Large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbance observed by superDARN Hokkaido HF radar and GPS networks on 15 December 2006, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, Vol. 115, A06309. doi:10.1029/2009JA014297.
  6. Huang X., Reinisch B.W., Vertical electron density profiles from the digisonde network, Advances in Space Research, 1996, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 121–129.
  7. Kurkin V.I., Pirog O.M., Polekh N.M., Mikhalev A.V., Poddelsky I.N., Stepanov A.E., Ionospheric response to geomagnetic disturbances in the north eastern region of Asia during the minimum of 23-th cycle of solar activity, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2008, Vol. 70, pp. 2346–2357.
  8. Lei J., Wang W., Burns A.G., Solomon S.C., Richmond A.D., Wiltberger M., Goncharenko L.P., Coster A., Reinisch B.W., Observations and simulations of the ionospheric and thermospheric response to the December 2006 geomagnetic storm: Initial phase, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, Vol. 113, A01314. doi:10.1029/2007JA012807.
  9. Lei J., Burns A.G., Tsugava T., Wang W., Solomon S.C., Wiltberger M., Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, Vol. 113, A06310. doi:10.1029/2008JA013090.
  10. Pedatella N.M., Lei J., Larson K.M., Forbes J.M., Observations of the ionospheric response to the 15 December 2006 geomagnetic storm: Long-duration positive storm effect, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2009, Vol. 114, A12313. doi:10.1029/2009JA014568.
  11. Picone J.M., Hedin A.E., Drob D.P., NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, Vol. 107, A12. doi:10.1029/2002JA009430.
  12. Romanova E.B., Pirog O.M., Polekh N.M., Tashchilin A.V., Zherebtsov G.A., Pirog O.M., Shi, Wang J.K., Modeling of ionospheric parameter variations in East Asia during geomagnetic disturbances, Advances in Space Research, 2008, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 569–578.
  13. Sojka J.J., Rasmussen C.E., Schunk R.W., An interplanetary magnetic field dependent model of the ionospheric convection electric field, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1986, Vol. 91, pp. 11-281–11-290.
  14. Tashchilin A.V., Romanova E.B., Numerical modeling the high-latitude ionosphere, Proc. COSPAR Colloquia Series, 2002, Vol. 14, pp. 315–325.
  15. Tereshchenko V.D., Vasiljev E.B., Ogloblina O.F., Tereshchenko V.A., Chernyakov S.M., The response of the polar lower ionosphere to powerful solar flares on December, Physics of Auroral Phenomena: Proc. 30 Annual Seminar, Apatity, 2007, pp. 196–198.
  16. Zolotukhina N., Polekha N., Kurkin V., Pirog O., Samsonov S., Moiseyev A., Magnetospheric disturbances associated with the 13 December 2006 solar flare and their ionospheric effects over North-East Asia, Advances in Space Research, 2012, Vol. 49, pp. 883–897.