Журнал

About Editorial Board Information for authors and reviewers Publication ethics Contacts User Account: send / review a manuscript
Archive
Volume 21, 2024
Number 1 Number 2
Volume 20, 2023
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 19, 2022
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 18, 2021
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 17, 2020
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 16, 2019
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 15, 2018
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 14, 2017
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7
Volume 13, 2016
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 12, 2015
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6
Volume 11, 2014
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 10, 2013
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 9, 2012
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5
Volume 8, 2011
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Volume 7, 2010
Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4
Issue 6, 2009
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 5, 2008
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 4, 2007
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 3, 2006
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 2, 2005
Volume 1 Volume 2
Issue 1, 2004
Volume 1
Search
Find:
русский
ISSN 2070-7401 (Print), ISSN 2411-0280 (Online)
Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN REMOTE SENSING OF THE EARTH FROM SPACE

  

Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2012, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 27-36

The History of Remote Sensing Methods Application During Elimination of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident

B.V. Shilin 1, V.I. Gornyy 1, V.I. Vermyev 2
1 Scientific Research Centre for Ecological Safety, Russian Academy of Sciences, 18, Korpusnaya Str., Saint-Petersburg, 197110, Russia
2 Saint-Petersburg State Electrotechnical University, 5, Prof. Popov Str., Saint-Petersburg, 197376, Russia
The history of remote sensing methods application during the elimination of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident is reviewed. The analysis of achievements in the application of satellite flown and airborne surveys on mapping of environment contaminations by radionuclides was done. The conclusion about necessity of systematic investigations in this approach was done.
Keywords: Chernobyl, accident, satellite, irradiation, radioactivity
Full text

References:

  1. Boyarchuk K.A., Kononov E.N., Lyakhov G.A., Pis'ma v ZhTF, 1993, Vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 67–73.
  2. Verem'ev V.I., Gorbunov I.G., Kalenichenko S.P., Ral'nikov V.I., Monitoring, 1996, No. 3(7), p. 21.
  3. Verem'ev V.I., Konovalov A.A., Radiolokatsionnie metody obnaruzheniya i otsenki parametrov atmosfernih neodnorodnostey tehnogennogo proishozhdeniya (Radar methods of anthropogenic atmospheric inhomogeneities detection and assessment), Saint-Petersburg: SPbGETU “LETI”, 2008, 136 p.
  4. Gornyi V.I., Kritsuk S.G., Latypov I.Sh., Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2011, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 179–194.
  5. Didenko A.N., Usov Yu.P., Yushkov Yu.G., Atomnaya energiya, Vol. 80, Issue 1, 1996, pp. 47–54.
  6. Elokhin A.P., Patent №12147137 RF, 2000.
  7. Elokhin A.P., Kononov E.N., Atomnaya energiya, 1996, Vol. 80, Issue 2, pp. I29– I35.
  8. Laverov N. P., Pulinets S. A., Uzunov D. P., Doklady Akademii nauk, 2011, Vol. 441, No. 2, pp. 245–248.
  9. Mit'ko V.B., Verem'ev V.I., Petrov A.A., Problemy prognozirovaniya i predotvrashcheniya chrezvychainykh situatsii i ikh posledstvii. Tezisy dokladov nauch.-prakt. konf. (Proc. Conference “Problems of Emergency Situations Forecasting, Prevention and Consequences”), 2005, p. 95.
  10. Primenenie radiolokatsionnykh dannykh, aerologicheskoi i meteorologicheskoi informatsii dlya otsenki aerozol'nogo radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya pri avariinykh situatsiyakh na AES (na primere Chernobyl'skoi AES) (Radar, aerological and meteorological data application for the aerosol pollution assesment), 1997, 48 p.
  11. Davids C., Tyler A.N., Detecting contamination-induced tree stress within the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, Vol. 85, pp. 30 –38.
  12. Davids C., Doulgeris A., Unsupervised change detection of multitemporal Landsat imagery to identify changes in land cover following the Chernobyl accident, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, IGARSS, 2007, pp. 3486 –3489.
  13. McClellan G.E., Hemmer T.H., DeWitt R.N., Chernobyl Doses Volume 2-Conifer Stress Near Chernobyl Derived from Landsat Imagery, Technical Report DNA-TR-92-37-V2 Defense Nuclear Agency, Los Angeles, 1992, 83 p.
  14. Pulinets S., Ouzounov D., Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model – An unified concept for earthquake precursors validation, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, Vol. 41, pp. 371–382.
  15. Richter R., Lehmann F., Haydn R., Volk P., Analysis of LANDSAT TM images of Chernobyl, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1986, No. 7, pp. 1859–1867.
  16. Whicker F.W., Fraley L., Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Terrestrial Plant Communities, Advances in Radiation Biology, 1974, Vol. 4, pp. 317-366.